Proving ln(x^2+y^2) is a Potential Function

  • Thread starter Thread starter bugatti79
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Potential
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for a given vector field. The vector field in question is expressed as \(\frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}\), and participants are attempting to connect their calculations of the gradient to this potential function.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are calculating the gradient of the potential function and questioning how it relates to the logarithmic function. Some express uncertainty about their calculations and the presence of square roots in the vector field.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing calculations and questioning the correctness of their approaches. Some guidance has been offered regarding the proper method for finding the potential function, but there is no clear consensus on the connection to the logarithmic function or the correct form of the potential function.

Contextual Notes

There are indications of confusion regarding the calculations and whether the presence of square roots in the vector field is a typographical error. Participants are also exploring the implications of their findings on the potential function.

bugatti79
Messages
786
Reaction score
4

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi[/itex] as

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi[/itex] as

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks

It doesn't because you have calculated it incorrectly. ##\nabla f = \langle f_x, f_y\rangle##. Is that what you did?
 
LCKurtz said:
It doesn't because you have calculated it incorrectly. ##\nabla f = \langle f_x, f_y\rangle##. Is that what you did?

I just took the gradient

[itex]\displaystyle \nabla \phi =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{2x \vec i}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{2y \vec j}{\sqrt{ x^2+y^2}}[/itex]..?
 
bugatti79 said:
I just took the gradient

[itex]\displaystyle \nabla \phi =\frac{\partial}{\partial x} \frac{2x \vec i}{\sqrt {x^2+y^2}}+\frac{\partial}{\partial y} \frac{2y \vec j}{\sqrt{ x^2+y^2}}[/itex]..?

You were supposed to show that ##\phi(x,y) = \ln{(x^2+y^2)}## is a potential function for your vector field. ##\phi## is what you should be taking the gradient of.
 
bugatti79 said:

Homework Statement



Show that ln(x^2+y^2) is a potential function for the following vector field

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}} +\frac{2y \vec j}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/itex]

I calculate [itex]\nabla \phi[/itex] as

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec i +\frac{2x^2}{(x^2+y^2)^{3/2}} \vec j[/itex]

I don't know how this connects to the log function...?

Thanks

To find the potential function, set [tex]f_{x}=\frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/tex]Then take the integral w.r.t. x. which then rewrite f(x,y)=...+g(y). Then take the derivative of this w.r.t. y and equate it to the second one. Then f(x,y), the potential function satisfies the vector field.
 
HACR said:
To find the potential function, set [tex]f_{x}=\frac{2x \vec i}{(x^2+y^2)^{1/2}}[/tex]Then take the integral w.r.t. x. which then rewrite f(x,y)=...+g(y). Then take the derivative of this w.r.t. y and equate it to the second one. Then f(x,y), the potential function satisfies the vector field.

Thanks, noted.



LCKurtz said:
You were supposed to show that ##\phi(x,y) = \ln{(x^2+y^2)}## is a potential function for your vector field. ##\phi## is what you should be taking the gradient of.

Then I calculate this, I don't know where the sqrt comes into it unless its a typo in the question?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y}{x^2+y^2} \vec j +\frac{2x}{x^2+y^2} \vec i[/itex]
 
bugatti79 said:
Thanks, noted.

Then I calculate this, I don't know where the sqrt comes into it unless its a typo in the question?

[itex]\displaystyle \frac{2y}{x^2+y^2} \vec j +\frac{2x}{x^2+y^2} \vec i[/itex]

This is what I get also.

It looks like the correct potential for that vector field is [itex]\displaystyle \phi(x,\ y)=-2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+C[/itex]
 
SammyS said:
This is what I get also.

It looks like the correct potential for that vector field is [itex]\displaystyle \phi(x,\ y)=-2\sqrt{x^2+y^2}+C[/itex]

V. good.

Thank you SammyS.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K