MHB Proving Orthogonal Polynomials: A Weighted Integral

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you haven't defined your weight function w(x), but let's assume it is the constant function 1. clearly $1,x$ are orthogonal, so we can start with a basis:

$B = \{1,x,\dots \}$

now let's look at what our third basis element $ax^2 + bx + c$ might be:

being orthogonal to 1 requires that $\int_{-1}^1ax^2 + bx + c\ dx = 0$. evaluating the integral, we find that:

$\frac{a}{3} + c - (\frac{-a}{3} + (-c)) = \frac{2a}{3} + 2c = 0$, and simplifying we get: $c = \frac{-a}{3}$.

so our second degree polynomial is of the form: $ax^2 + bx - \frac{a}{3}$.

since we must also have our second-degree polynomial orthogonal to x, this means that:

$\int_{-1}^1 ax^3 + bx^2 - \frac{ax}{3}\ dx = 0$, and evaluating THAT interval leads to $b = 0$.

traditionally, these polynomials are "normalized" so that $\phi_k(1) = 1$, doing so for:

$\phi_2(x) = ax^2 - \frac{a}{3}$ leads to: $a = \frac{3}{2}$, so that we get: $\phi_2(x) = \frac{1}{2}(3x^2 - 1)$.

the point is, there is no reason to assume that the "standard" basis: $\{1,x,x^2,x^3,\dots \}$ will be orthogonal with respect to the inner product defined by:

$\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 f(x)g(x)\ dx$ or the "weighted inner product" $\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 w(x)f(x)g(x)\ dx$

if you continue the process i started above (or by using gram-schmidt), you will get:

$\phi_3(x) = \frac{1}{2}(5x^3 - 3x)$ which can be verified to be orthogonal to $\phi_0, \phi_1,\phi_2$.
 
thanks, I edited my post
can you check it again ?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
Then why do you assert that they are orthogonal. In particular, what is your definition of "orthogonal"?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0

There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB

it is true, our instructor fixed the question as what you said (\phi_k is of order k )and i solved it
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top