Proving Orthogonal Polynomials: A Weighted Integral

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of orthogonal polynomials defined on an interval [a,b] with respect to a weight function w(x). Participants explore the implications of orthogonality in relation to integrals involving polynomials of varying degrees, particularly focusing on proving that the integral of a product of an orthogonal polynomial and another polynomial of lower degree equals zero.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Debate/contested
  • Mathematical reasoning

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the definition of orthogonality, noting that while x^2 and x^3 are orthogonal, x is not orthogonal to x^3 over the interval [-1,1].
  • Another participant suggests assuming the weight function w(x) is constant, leading to a basis of polynomials and deriving conditions for orthogonality.
  • There is a discussion about the normalization of polynomials and the implications of the inner product defined by the weight function.
  • Some participants express uncertainty about the implicit assumption that the polynomials \(\phi_k(x)\) correspond to their degree, indicating that if this assumption does not hold, the orthogonality result may fail.
  • A later reply indicates that the instructor clarified the question to align with the assumption that \(\phi_k\) is of degree k, which led to a resolution for that participant.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants express differing views on the definition and implications of orthogonality in the context of the problem. There is no consensus on the initial question posed, and some participants highlight the need for clearer definitions and assumptions.

Contextual Notes

Participants note potential limitations in the problem statement, particularly regarding the assumptions about the degrees of the polynomials involved and the definition of orthogonality with respect to the weight function.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you haven't defined your weight function w(x), but let's assume it is the constant function 1. clearly $1,x$ are orthogonal, so we can start with a basis:

$B = \{1,x,\dots \}$

now let's look at what our third basis element $ax^2 + bx + c$ might be:

being orthogonal to 1 requires that $\int_{-1}^1ax^2 + bx + c\ dx = 0$. evaluating the integral, we find that:

$\frac{a}{3} + c - (\frac{-a}{3} + (-c)) = \frac{2a}{3} + 2c = 0$, and simplifying we get: $c = \frac{-a}{3}$.

so our second degree polynomial is of the form: $ax^2 + bx - \frac{a}{3}$.

since we must also have our second-degree polynomial orthogonal to x, this means that:

$\int_{-1}^1 ax^3 + bx^2 - \frac{ax}{3}\ dx = 0$, and evaluating THAT interval leads to $b = 0$.

traditionally, these polynomials are "normalized" so that $\phi_k(1) = 1$, doing so for:

$\phi_2(x) = ax^2 - \frac{a}{3}$ leads to: $a = \frac{3}{2}$, so that we get: $\phi_2(x) = \frac{1}{2}(3x^2 - 1)$.

the point is, there is no reason to assume that the "standard" basis: $\{1,x,x^2,x^3,\dots \}$ will be orthogonal with respect to the inner product defined by:

$\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 f(x)g(x)\ dx$ or the "weighted inner product" $\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 w(x)f(x)g(x)\ dx$

if you continue the process i started above (or by using gram-schmidt), you will get:

$\phi_3(x) = \frac{1}{2}(5x^3 - 3x)$ which can be verified to be orthogonal to $\phi_0, \phi_1,\phi_2$.
 
thanks, I edited my post
can you check it again ?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
Then why do you assert that they are orthogonal. In particular, what is your definition of "orthogonal"?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0

There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB

it is true, our instructor fixed the question as what you said (\phi_k is of order k )and i solved it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K