Proving Orthogonal Polynomials: A Weighted Integral

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the orthogonality of polynomials within the context of weighted integrals. Specifically, it addresses the integral condition \int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0 for polynomials Q_k(x) of degree k. The participants clarify that the weight function w(x) must be defined, and they demonstrate the orthogonality of polynomials using the interval [-1,1] and the Gram-Schmidt process. The final conclusion confirms that the orthogonal polynomials can be derived correctly when the assumptions about their degrees are explicitly stated.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of orthogonal polynomials and their properties
  • Familiarity with weighted integrals and weight functions
  • Knowledge of the Gram-Schmidt process for orthogonalization
  • Basic calculus, particularly integration techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of orthogonal polynomials in detail
  • Learn about the Gram-Schmidt process for generating orthogonal sets
  • Explore different weight functions and their impact on polynomial orthogonality
  • Investigate applications of orthogonal polynomials in numerical analysis and approximation theory
USEFUL FOR

Mathematicians, students of advanced calculus, and researchers in numerical analysis who are interested in the properties and applications of orthogonal polynomials.

Amer
Messages
259
Reaction score
0
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
you haven't defined your weight function w(x), but let's assume it is the constant function 1. clearly $1,x$ are orthogonal, so we can start with a basis:

$B = \{1,x,\dots \}$

now let's look at what our third basis element $ax^2 + bx + c$ might be:

being orthogonal to 1 requires that $\int_{-1}^1ax^2 + bx + c\ dx = 0$. evaluating the integral, we find that:

$\frac{a}{3} + c - (\frac{-a}{3} + (-c)) = \frac{2a}{3} + 2c = 0$, and simplifying we get: $c = \frac{-a}{3}$.

so our second degree polynomial is of the form: $ax^2 + bx - \frac{a}{3}$.

since we must also have our second-degree polynomial orthogonal to x, this means that:

$\int_{-1}^1 ax^3 + bx^2 - \frac{ax}{3}\ dx = 0$, and evaluating THAT interval leads to $b = 0$.

traditionally, these polynomials are "normalized" so that $\phi_k(1) = 1$, doing so for:

$\phi_2(x) = ax^2 - \frac{a}{3}$ leads to: $a = \frac{3}{2}$, so that we get: $\phi_2(x) = \frac{1}{2}(3x^2 - 1)$.

the point is, there is no reason to assume that the "standard" basis: $\{1,x,x^2,x^3,\dots \}$ will be orthogonal with respect to the inner product defined by:

$\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 f(x)g(x)\ dx$ or the "weighted inner product" $\langle f,g \rangle = \int_{-1}^1 w(x)f(x)g(x)\ dx$

if you continue the process i started above (or by using gram-schmidt), you will get:

$\phi_3(x) = \frac{1}{2}(5x^3 - 3x)$ which can be verified to be orthogonal to $\phi_0, \phi_1,\phi_2$.
 
thanks, I edited my post
can you check it again ?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0
Then why do you assert that they are orthogonal. In particular, what is your definition of "orthogonal"?
 
Amer said:
Let \{ \phi_0,\phi_1,...,\phi_n\} othogonal set of polynomials on [a,b] n>0, with a weight function w(x) prove that

\int_{a}^b w(x)\phi_n Q_k (x) \; dx = 0

for any polynomail Q_k(x) of degree k<n ?

My work :

I think there is a problem in the question since if we take x^2,x^3 on the interval [-1,1] they are orthogonal

but if we take x

\int_{-1}^{1} x(x^3 ) \; dx \neq 0

There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB
 
CaptainBlack said:
There is something missing from this, there seems to be an implicit assumption that \( \phi_k(x) \) is of degree \( k \) (or rather that \( \phi_n(x) \) is of degree \(n\) and every degree less than \(n\) is represented by one of the other \(\phi\)s ). If this is not the case then the result can fail.

CB

it is true, our instructor fixed the question as what you said (\phi_k is of order k )and i solved it
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
5K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K