Proving P(n) for Every Positive Even Integer

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a predicate P(n) for every positive even integer using mathematical induction. The original poster is attempting to understand the implications of a given statement about P(k) and its relationship to odd integers less than k, as well as the base case of P(1).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the setup of the induction proof, questioning whether to use strong induction or regular induction. There are discussions about the implications of the base case and how to interpret the conditions given in the problem statement.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, analyzing the implications of the statements made about P(k) and the conditions under which P(k+1) holds true. Some have suggested starting points for the induction, while others are clarifying the definitions and relationships between odd and even integers in the context of the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is some confusion regarding the definitions of even and odd integers, particularly in relation to the base case and the values of k being discussed. Participants are also noting the need to clarify the meaning of the original statement and how it applies to the proof process.

mr_coffee
Messages
1,613
Reaction score
1
Hello everyone. I'm trying to set this problem up to prove by induction but having some issues.

Suppose that for some Predicate P(k), you first prove that P(1) is true, and then you do the following. You prove that, for every positive even integer k, if P(i) is true for all odd integers i such that 0 < i < k, then P(k+1) is true.

For which values of n can you now be certain that P(n) is true? Give an explanation of why your answer is correct.

Hint: you have to "unwind the meaning of the first paragraph"


So am i suppose to actually prove that for every positive even integer k, if P(i) is true for all odd integers i such that 0 < i < k, then P(k+1) is true.

Then test the base case to make sure p(1) is true?

And if that is true, then I have to go on to prove that
P(1)->P(2)
P(2)->P(3)
P(3)->P(4)
P(n)->P(n+1) ?

Am I suppose to be using Strong mathematical induction or just regular? P(n) makes me think i have to use strong, because in those they usually start out with,

Let the property P(n) be the inequality or statement...

So could i write:

Let the Property P(n) be 2k+1, where k is any positive integer >= 1. #this would be the definition of an odd number.

But I still don't see what I'm proving. Usually I'm proving 2 statements are equivlent to each other in regular induction. ANd in strong induction I've only been proving things in a sequence so I'm confused on how to set this up and the book had no examples of this type. Any help would be great! Thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Suppose that for some Predicate P(k), you first prove that P(1) is true, and then you do the following. You prove that, for every positive even integer k, if P(i) is true for all odd integers i such that 0 < i < k, then P(k+1) is true.

For which values of n can you now be certain that P(n) is true? Give an explanation of why your answer is correct.

Hint: you have to "unwind the meaning of the first paragraph"

You don't need to perform induction, it is done in the paragraph. You need to analyze the paragraph to see which values of n it proved are true
for P(n). To break down the paragraph:

P(k) is true for the first even number k=1, and for k=1, P(i) is true for all odds less than k=1 and thus P(k+1)=P(2) is true.

Now P(k) is true for the second even number k=2, and for k=2, P(i) is true for all odds less than k=2 and thus P(k+1)=P(3) is true.

Continuing in this way, P(k) is true for all even natural numbers k greater than 0, and P(i) is true for all odd natural numbers less than any k, so it is true for all odd numbers. Thus P(n) is true for all natural numbers.
 
The second sentence is saying something about an even k that's greater than 0 (0 < i < k), so start with k=2. What can you conclude from that paragraph?

kreil said:
P(k) is true for the first even number k=1, and for k=1, P(i) is true for all odds less than k=1 and thus P(k+1)=P(2) is true.

1 is not the first even number, it's odd.
 
I guess I interpreted it wrong, I figured n=1 is i=1, n=2 is k=1, n=3 is i=2 etc...
 
I understand what kreil is saying can I interpret what he said but instead of starting out with 1, start out with 2 like you said shmoe?
If i take what kreil has said, and did the following (i'm goign to copy and paste ur stuff kriel).

P(k) is true for the first even number k=2, and for k=1, P(i) is true for all odd integers i such that 0 < i < k, therefore P(k+1)

But what confuses me here is, you say start with k = 2, but they say P(1) is true, which is odd, not even.
So would I instead write:
P(k) is true for the first odd number k=1, and for k=2, P(i) is true for all even numbers P(k+1) and thus P(k+1)=P(2) is true.Now P(k) is true for the second even number k=2, and for k=2, P(i) is true for all odds less than k=2 and thus P(k+1)=P(3) is true.

Continuing in this way, P(k) is true for all even natural numbers k greater than 0, and P(i) is true for all odd natural numbers less than any k, so it is true for all odd numbers. Thus P(n) is true for all natural numbers.

I modified some of kreils stuff.

Thanks for the help guys!
 
mr_coffee said:
P(k) is true for the first odd number k=1, and for k=2, P(i) is true for all even numbers P(k+1) and thus P(k+1)=P(2) is true.

Where did the bold part come from?

You start off knowing that if k is even and if P(i) is true for all odd integers i such that 0 < i < k, then P(k+1) is true.

When k=2, you can check the conditions of this line. Meaning we have to consider P(i) for odd values of i satisfying 0<i<2, namely i=1. We already know P(1) is true, so these conditions are satsified for k=2 and we can conclude P(2+1)=P(3) is true. Nothing at all is said about P(2) here.

Now what happens at k=4?
 
oh i understand now I think!
well you know k(4) is true because P(3) is true.
and when k = 4,
P(4+1) = P(5) must also be true and this will keep going on and on because a number is either even or odd. So P(n) would be true for all integers right?
 
mr_coffee said:
oh i understand now I think!
well you know k(4) is true because P(3) is true.
and when k = 4,
P(4+1) = P(5) must also be true and this will keep going on and on because a number is either even or odd. So P(n) would be true for all integers right?

What's k(4)?

How are you concluding that P(2) is true?
 
whoops i have no idea why I wrote that.

We know that P(1) is true;
and
For every positive even integer k
P(i)->p(k+1)

Which i thought means, if P(i) is true, then p(k+1) must be true acording to the universal instantiation, that no matter what particular integer i is subsititued in place of i, the statement "If P(i) then P(k+1)" is true. Doesn't this statement prove it? Because you proved 1 is true, which is an odd number, then you add 1+1 = 2, so now P(2) is true because P(1) was true. and p(2)->p(3) now P(3) is true because P(2) was true and P(1) was true.

Or do i have to do it like the following:
P(1) base case true;
P(2)->P(2+1)
P(3)->P(3+1)

I was thinking in terms of:
P(1) base case true;
P(1) -> P(1+1)
P(2) -> P(2+1)
...
...
...
P(n) -> P(n+1)
 
  • #10
mr_coffee said:
For every positive even integer k
P(i)->p(k+1)

You don't know this at all.

You know "if k is even and P(i) is true for all odd i with 0<i<k then P(k+1) is true".


Maybe stating it like:

"if k is even and P(1), P(3), ..., P(k-1) are all true, then P(k+1) is true"

will help, the "i" seems to be a source of confusion.
 
  • #11
Ahh that does help, i'll give it another try, thanks for the help!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
4K
Replies
15
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
18
Views
3K