Proving ƩP(n)/n! x^n = P(x)e^x for Polynomials

  • Thread starter Thread starter aaaa202
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Polynomials
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the generalization of a series involving polynomials and their relationship with the exponential function. Participants are exploring whether the expression ƩP(n)/n! x^n equals P(x)e^x holds true for arbitrary polynomials P(n).

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are examining specific cases of polynomials, such as P(n) = n(n-1), and questioning the validity of the general expression. There is an attempt to relate the series to known series expansions, particularly that of e^x.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing insights and suggestions for further exploration. Some guidance has been offered regarding the expansion of e^x and how to express the series more explicitly, but no consensus has been reached on the general case.

Contextual Notes

There is a mention of potential confusion regarding the series and factorials, indicating that participants may be grappling with the underlying concepts and definitions involved in the problem.

aaaa202
Messages
1,144
Reaction score
2
You have:

Ʃ(n+1)/n! x^n = (1+x)e^x

Is it in general true with a polynomium that:

ƩP(n)/n! x^n = P(x)e^x

?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
That's easy to check. What is ƩP(n)/n! x^n for P(n) = n(n-1)?
 
uhhh I don't know. Is that a series I should know? :(

Edit: Wait if you let the factorials cancel out you get: Ʃx^n/(n-2)! but doesn't get me furhter
 
aaaa202 said:
uhhh I don't know. Is that a series I should know? :(

Edit: Wait if you let the factorials cancel out you get: Ʃx^n/(n-2)! but doesn't get me furhter

Yes, it does (or should); you just need to write things out more explicitly:
[tex]e^x = 1 + x + \frac{1}{2!}x^2 + \frac{1}{3!} x^3 + \frac{1}{4!} x^4 + \cdots.[/tex] Now write out ##\Sigma\: n(n-1) x^n/n!## in a similarly-detailed way.

Using the Ʃ notation saves time and writing after you are thoroughly familiar with the techniques, but until then you might do better to avoid relying on it.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K