MHB Proving parallel lines using points and vectors

algebruh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, this is a problem given to me by my prof for an assignment, and the TAs at my tutorials haven't been much help. Was wondering where to go with this question.

View attachment 9264

Also, I'm a uni freshman who isn't used to the whole concept of proofs, and a lot of what my profs say seem to be a slew of symbols and numbers before they even define anything, but I do the textbook readings and can comprehend those fairly easily. Was anyone on here's transition from high school math to university math a massive jump?
 

Attachments

  • help.png
    help.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 143
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to assume you were exposed to the triangle proportionality theorem in a HS geometry course. To complete your proof, we require the use of its converse ... if you are not familiar or need a refresher, visit the attached link below.

https://sites.google.com/site/mrrosessite/geometry/geometry-objectives/-g-srt-similarity-right-triangles-and-trigonometry/srt4/converse-of-the-triangle-proportionality-theorem
For your problem, if we can show $\dfrac{OA}{AC} = \dfrac{OP}{PR}$, then by the converse of the triangle proportionality theorem $AP \parallel CR$.

Starting with $\Delta OCQ$, you are given $BP \parallel CQ$. Using the triangle proportionality theorem ...

$\dfrac{OB}{BC} = \dfrac{OP}{PQ} \implies \dfrac{OA+AB}{BC} = \dfrac{OP}{PQ} \implies \color{red}{(OA)(PQ)+(AB)(PQ)=(BC)(OP)}$

Same drill with $\Delta OBR$ ...

$\dfrac{OA}{AB} = \dfrac{OQ}{QR} \implies \dfrac{OA}{AB} = \dfrac{OP+PQ}{QR} \implies \color{red}{(OP)(AB)+(PQ)(AB)=(OA)(QR)}$subtracting the second red equation from the first yields ...

$\color{red}(OA)(PQ)-(OP)(AB)=(BC)(OP)-(OA)(QR)$

rearranging ...

$\color{red} (OA)(PQ)+(OA)(QR) = (BC)(OP)+(OP)(AB)$

factoring both sides ...

$\color{red} (OA)(PQ+QR) = (OP)(AB+BC) \implies (OA)(PR) = (OP)(AC) \implies \dfrac{OA}{AC}= \dfrac{OP}{PR} \implies AP \parallel CR$
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
When decomposing a representation ##\rho## of a finite group ##G## into irreducible representations, we can find the number of times the representation contains a particular irrep ##\rho_0## through the character inner product $$ \langle \chi, \chi_0\rangle = \frac{1}{|G|} \sum_{g\in G} \chi(g) \chi_0(g)^*$$ where ##\chi## and ##\chi_0## are the characters of ##\rho## and ##\rho_0##, respectively. Since all group elements in the same conjugacy class have the same characters, this may be...
Back
Top