MHB Proving parallel lines using points and vectors

algebruh
Messages
1
Reaction score
0
Hey, this is a problem given to me by my prof for an assignment, and the TAs at my tutorials haven't been much help. Was wondering where to go with this question.

View attachment 9264

Also, I'm a uni freshman who isn't used to the whole concept of proofs, and a lot of what my profs say seem to be a slew of symbols and numbers before they even define anything, but I do the textbook readings and can comprehend those fairly easily. Was anyone on here's transition from high school math to university math a massive jump?
 

Attachments

  • help.png
    help.png
    12.1 KB · Views: 152
Physics news on Phys.org
I'm going to assume you were exposed to the triangle proportionality theorem in a HS geometry course. To complete your proof, we require the use of its converse ... if you are not familiar or need a refresher, visit the attached link below.

https://sites.google.com/site/mrrosessite/geometry/geometry-objectives/-g-srt-similarity-right-triangles-and-trigonometry/srt4/converse-of-the-triangle-proportionality-theorem
For your problem, if we can show $\dfrac{OA}{AC} = \dfrac{OP}{PR}$, then by the converse of the triangle proportionality theorem $AP \parallel CR$.

Starting with $\Delta OCQ$, you are given $BP \parallel CQ$. Using the triangle proportionality theorem ...

$\dfrac{OB}{BC} = \dfrac{OP}{PQ} \implies \dfrac{OA+AB}{BC} = \dfrac{OP}{PQ} \implies \color{red}{(OA)(PQ)+(AB)(PQ)=(BC)(OP)}$

Same drill with $\Delta OBR$ ...

$\dfrac{OA}{AB} = \dfrac{OQ}{QR} \implies \dfrac{OA}{AB} = \dfrac{OP+PQ}{QR} \implies \color{red}{(OP)(AB)+(PQ)(AB)=(OA)(QR)}$subtracting the second red equation from the first yields ...

$\color{red}(OA)(PQ)-(OP)(AB)=(BC)(OP)-(OA)(QR)$

rearranging ...

$\color{red} (OA)(PQ)+(OA)(QR) = (BC)(OP)+(OP)(AB)$

factoring both sides ...

$\color{red} (OA)(PQ+QR) = (OP)(AB+BC) \implies (OA)(PR) = (OP)(AC) \implies \dfrac{OA}{AC}= \dfrac{OP}{PR} \implies AP \parallel CR$
 
Thread 'How to define vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
8K