Proving R/Q and Q/Z Has No Element of Finite Order

  • Thread starter Thread starter zcdfhn
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Groups
Click For Summary
R/Q has no elements of finite order other than the identity, as any non-zero element cannot be raised to a power to yield zero. The discussion emphasizes understanding R/Q through its definition, where cosets are formed based on rational differences. It clarifies that the operation involves addition of cosets, not multiplication, making the proof straightforward. Additionally, Q/Z is discussed, highlighting that every element has a finite order, reinforcing the concept of quotient sets. Overall, the conversation enhances comprehension of these mathematical structures and their properties.
zcdfhn
Messages
23
Reaction score
0
Prove R/Q has no element of finite order other than the identity.

First of all, I have trouble visualizing what R/Q is. But I do know that afterwards you can try to raise an element in R/Q to a power to get to 0, but there will not be a finite number that will be able to do so except zero itself.

So I think I have the jist of the problem figured, but I need help visualizing R/Q. I would appreciate if you could give examples of what numbers belong to what cosets.

I also have a similar question about Q/Z, and I have to prove that every element has a finite order.

Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
You don't try to visualize R/Q (I don't think it's possible to do so, and isn't necessary either), just take the definition: [x] and [y] are the same coset if and only if x-y is a rational number.

Now, the operation is addition of cosets (not multiplication, so no raising things to powers), and you want to show that if [x] is not [0], i.e. x is not rational, then [nx] is not the [0] for any n, i.e. that nx is not rational either for any n. So you see that just writing out what it is that you need to proves makes the question entirely trivial.
 
Thank you so much! You really clarified my view on quotient sets, I finally found a connection to what I learned about the quotient Z/nZ and it makes so much sense now.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
15K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K