MHB Proving Rationality of Squares of 9th Day 2 ARO 2004/2005 Numbers

Smb
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Ten mutually distinct non-zero reals are given such that for any two, either their sum or their product is rational. Prove that squares of all these numbers are rational.
I tried using 3 of those numbers - a, b and c. And I checked each of the possible situations but I'm not sure if my maths teacher is going to accept it.
The problem is from the All-Russian Olympiad 2004/2005 9th Day 2.
 
Last edited:
Mathematics news on Phys.org
Is this a homework assignment? If so, I recommend you post as much working as possible.
 
Joppy said:
Is this a homework assignment? If so, I recommend you post as much working as possible.

I worked out the answer easily but the method is slow.
I'll write for the first one because I don't have much time now:
a+b(-Q
b+c(-Q
a+c(-Q
ab+bc+ac+b^2(-Q
ab+bc+ac+c^2(-Q
(b-c)(b+c)(-Q
b-c(- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers.
b^2-2bc+c^2-B^2-2bc-c^2(-Q
=> bc (- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers. =>
b^2(- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers.
 
Smb said:
I worked out the answer easily but the method is slow.
I'll write for the first one because I don't have much time now:
a+b(-Q
b+c(-Q
a+c(-Q
ab+bc+ac+b^2(-Q
ab+bc+ac+c^2(-Q
(b-c)(b+c)(-Q
b-c(- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers.
b^2-2bc+c^2-B^2-2bc-c^2(-Q
=> bc (- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers. =>
b^2(- Q Analogically we can do for each pair of numbers.

Hi Smb! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)Whatever way I can think of, it seems to be a number of cases, although I think we can do with fewer than you are suggesting.
Still, if we could cover all 8 similar cases we would be done, although I don't think we can.For starters, what you have now cannot occur, since if we start with $\def\inQ{\in\mathbb Q}
a+b, a+c \inQ$, then it follows that $(a+b)-(a+c) = (b-c) \inQ$.
Now suppose $b+c\inQ$, then $\frac 12((b+c)+(b-c))=b\inQ$ and similarly $c \inQ$, so that $bc\inQ$, which contradicts the either-or.
Therefore $b+c\not\inQ$.Let's start with assuming that we can find a triplet $(a,b,c)$ with $ab,ac\inQ$.
Then $\frac {ab}{ac}=\frac bc \inQ$, isn't it?
Now suppose $b+c\inQ$, then $\frac bc\cdot c + c = (\frac bc + 1)c \inQ$.
Can we figure out from there if any of $b$, $c$, and in particular $bc$ is rational? (Wondering)
And if so, can we find that $a^2\inQ$?
 
I like Serena said:
Hi Smb! Welcome to MHB! (Smile)Whatever way I can think of, it seems to be a number of cases, although I think we can do with fewer than you are suggesting.
Still, if we could cover all 8 similar cases we would be done, although I don't think we can.For starters, what you have now cannot occur, since if we start with $\def\inQ{\in\mathbb Q}
a+b, a+c \inQ$, then it follows that $(a+b)-(a+c) = (b-c) \inQ$.
Now suppose $b+c\inQ$, then $\frac 12((b+c)+(b-c))=b\inQ$ and similarly $c \inQ$, so that $bc\inQ$, which contradicts the either-or.
Therefore $b+c\not\inQ$.Let's start with assuming that we can find a triplet $(a,b,c)$ with $ab,ac\inQ$.
Then $\frac {ab}{ac}=\frac bc \inQ$, isn't it?
Now suppose $b+c\inQ$, then $\frac bc\cdot c + c = (\frac bc + 1)c \inQ$.
Can we figure out from there if any of $b$, $c$, and in particular $bc$ is rational? (Wondering)
And if so, can we find that $a^2\inQ$?
I forgot to rewrite it! I'm sorry for the misunderstanding it can be and/or.Both b +c(-Q and bc(-Q could be a case..
 
Smb said:
I forgot to rewrite it! I'm sorry for the misunderstanding it can be and/or.Both b +c(-Q and bc(-Q could be a case..

Fair enough. The proof doesn't really change though. Just a couple more cases to consider.
 
Insights auto threads is broken atm, so I'm manually creating these for new Insight articles. In Dirac’s Principles of Quantum Mechanics published in 1930 he introduced a “convenient notation” he referred to as a “delta function” which he treated as a continuum analog to the discrete Kronecker delta. The Kronecker delta is simply the indexed components of the identity operator in matrix algebra Source: https://www.physicsforums.com/insights/what-exactly-is-diracs-delta-function/ by...
Fermat's Last Theorem has long been one of the most famous mathematical problems, and is now one of the most famous theorems. It simply states that the equation $$ a^n+b^n=c^n $$ has no solutions with positive integers if ##n>2.## It was named after Pierre de Fermat (1607-1665). The problem itself stems from the book Arithmetica by Diophantus of Alexandria. It gained popularity because Fermat noted in his copy "Cubum autem in duos cubos, aut quadratoquadratum in duos quadratoquadratos, et...
I'm interested to know whether the equation $$1 = 2 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{1}{2 - \cdots}}$$ is true or not. It can be shown easily that if the continued fraction converges, it cannot converge to anything else than 1. It seems that if the continued fraction converges, the convergence is very slow. The apparent slowness of the convergence makes it difficult to estimate the presence of true convergence numerically. At the moment I don't know whether this converges or not.
Back
Top