MHB Proving Self-Adjoint ODE for Legendre Polynomials

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving that the first derivatives of Legendre polynomials satisfy a self-adjoint ordinary differential equation (ODE) with a specific eigenvalue. Participants explore the relationship between Legendre polynomials and their derivatives, referencing Rodrique's formula for generating these polynomials. The conversation highlights the need to establish whether the ODE is self-adjoint and discusses the use of Sturm-Liouville theory to solve it. A key point is the identification of the operator involved and the requirement to demonstrate that it is Hermitian, ultimately leading to the conclusion that the Legendre polynomials are indeed solutions to the Legendre ODE. The overall goal is to clarify the method for proving the self-adjoint nature of the ODE and finding the corresponding eigenvalues.
ognik
Messages
626
Reaction score
2
(I haven't encountered these before, also not in the book prior to this problem or in the near future ...)

Show that the 1st derivatives of the legendre polynomials satisfy a self-adjoint ODE with eigenvalue $\lambda = n(n+1)-2 $

Wiki shows a table of poly's , I don't think this is what the book means ...

Wiki also shows Rodrique's formula which looks more relevant - $ P_n(x) =\frac{1}{2^n}\frac{1}{2!} \d{^n{}}{{x}^n} (x^2-1)^n$
So I differentiated that a couple of times to see, and got $ P_0 =1, P_1 = x, P_2 = \frac{1}{2}(3x^2 - 1) ...$ - and realized I was just generating the polynomials. Basically I don't what I'm supposed to be doing?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Got a bit further along, I just couldn't find what one should do with the polys, so I tried to make an ODE out of the 1st 3 and that looks like a good guess (how should I have known?), I get :

$ y''+xy'+\frac{1}{2}(3x^2-1)y=0 ,[ p_0 =1, p_1 = x, p_2 =\frac{1}{2}(3x^2-1)] $ which I can (I hope) use sturm-L theory to to solve. Problem is book is not very clear on S-L theory and couldn't find anything very clear on the web, so please help me get the method right.

I believe I want to get an eigenvalue eqtn of the form: $ \mathcal{L}y=\lambda w(x)y $. First Check if self-adjoint, ie is $p_0' =p_1 $

A) If the eqtn was already self-adjoint, then $p=p_0, q=p_2$ and $ \mathcal{L} = (p\frac{d}{dx})' + q $ ...But where does w(x) normally come from? If I read it off for the original eqtn it = 1. I can't see how it would ever not be 1?

B) if not S-A, multiply the ODE by the integrating factor $= \mu(x)= \frac{1}{p_0} exp\int\frac{p_1}{p_0} dx$. Now $a_0=\mu, a_1=\mu p_1 , a_2=\mu p_2 $ giving a self adjoint ODE= $ a_0 y'' + a_1 y'+ a_2 y=0 $ and I follow A) above.
--------------------
Hoping the above is OK, I get $ \mu = e^{\frac{x^2}{2}}, \mathcal{L}y=\lambda y, where \: \mathcal{L}y = (py')'+qy, p=e^{\frac{x^2}{2}}, q=\frac{x}{2} e^{\frac{x^2}{2}} (3x^2-1)$
A hint please on what to do next?
 
I have honestly spent hours trying to make a decent start to this - not getting anywhere. I am not even sure what I'm supposed to doing - assume I'm stupid if necessary just to help get me started. Alternatively if the usual suspects are also stumped, knowing that would be a great comfort, leave a comment!

'Progress' since last post.

Wiki says that legendre polynomials are solutions to the Legendre ODE. I tried $y=p_0=1$ and it was a solution to $(1-x^2)y''-2xy'+n(n-1)=0 $ for n= 0 or 1.
$y=p_1=x$ gave me $2x=n^2+n$ which doesn't seem like a solution?

Tell me if I am mistaken, they want me to differentiate Legendre polynomials and to show they too are solutions of a self-adjoint ODE? If differentiating a poly gave a previous poly, that would answer the question, but they aren't related like that...

1) So - how many of them to differentiate? With a 2nd order ODE I would guess 2, but this doesn't limit it to 2nd order
2) If it was 2 poly's, $p'_0 = 0, p'_1 = 1$ which doesn't seem useful, should I instead start with $p_2= \frac{1}{2}\left(3{x}^{2}-1\right) $?
2) They say 'satisfy a self-adjoint ODE' - which one? I assume Legendres?
 
I don't know what space you are working on, but let us suppose it is $\mathcal{C}^{\infty}[-1,1]$

Consider the operator:

$H = D\circ(1-x^2)D$

where $D$ is the differentiation operator: $\dfrac{d}{dx}$ (so $D(f) = f'$), and $(1-x^2)D$ refers to "pointwise multiplication" by $(1-x^2)$, so for example, if $f(x) = \cos(x)$, then:

$H(f)(x) = \dfrac{d}{dx}((1-x^2)(-\sin(x)) = (x^2 - 1)\cos(x) + 2x\sin(x)$

Your task is, I believe, to show this operator is Hermitian, and to show $P_n$ is an eigenfunction of this operator, and then to calculate its eigenvalues.

To show $H$ is Hermitian, I believe the inner product you will employ is:

$\langle f,g\rangle = \int\limits_{-1}^1 f(x)g(x)\ dx$ (we can use the Riemann integral since our functions are smooth). This reduces to being "symmetric" (careful, here! some authors do not make this kind of distinction) since we have REAL-VALUED functions. In other words, no need to worry about complex-conjugations.

If I recall correctly (and I may not, it's literally been decades) this is a S-L problem of the form:

$\dfrac{d}{dx}\left[p(x)\dfrac{dy}{dx}\right] + q(x)y = -\lambda w(x)y$

with $p(x) = 1 - x^2, q(x) = 0$ and $w(x) = 1$.

The ODE associated with these polynomials is called Legendre's differential equation, and *that* "diffy q" shows the eigenvalues directly.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
48
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
867
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K