Proving Similar Matrices with Examples and Step-by-Step Instructions

  • Thread starter Thread starter holezch
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrices
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving a relationship involving similar matrices and linear transformations, specifically focusing on the expression [L_{A}]_{\gamma} = Q^{-1} A Q, where A is an n x n matrix and γ is an ordered basis for F^n. Participants are exploring the implications of changing bases and the associated notation.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants express confusion about the notation and the concept of changing bases. Questions arise regarding the meaning of [L_{A}]_{\gamma} and the role of the matrix Q in the transformation process. There is also a discussion about the unspecified original basis and how it relates to the basis γ.

Discussion Status

The conversation is ongoing, with participants seeking clarification on the notation and the relationship between the bases. Some guidance has been provided regarding the interpretation of the transformation and the role of the matrix Q, but no consensus has been reached on the specifics of the proof.

Contextual Notes

There is a noted lack of information about the original basis, which is assumed to be unspecified. Participants are also questioning the coordinates of the vectors in relation to the basis γ.

holezch
Messages
251
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let A [tex]\in M_{n x n }(F)[/tex] and let [tex]\gamma[/tex] be an ordered basis for [tex]F^{n}[/tex]. Then [tex][L_{A}]_{\gamma} = Q^{-1} A Q[/tex], where Q is the n x n matrix whose j-th column is the j-th vector of gamma.



The Attempt at a Solution



I think I'm confused about some of the technical details.. :S And I don't really have much of a plan for proving this at all :S.. any help? thank you
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well, you'll have to show us something.
Do you understand all the notation of the statement?

Maybe writing it out in words will help. Here's one way of writing the first sentence:

Let A be an element of the set of nxn matrices with elements in the field F.

Of particular interest: Do you understand what [LA]gamma means?
 
hgfalling said:
Well, you'll have to show us something.
Do you understand all the notation of the statement?

Maybe writing it out in words will help. Here's one way of writing the first sentence:

Let A be an element of the set of nxn matrices with elements in the field F.

Of particular interest: Do you understand what [LA]gamma means?



I think the notation may be messing with me.. I'm also confused about the changing bases.. We need to change basis x to basis gamma. Are we just not given the basis x?

and [LA]gamma is a linear transformation, so we need to decide the coordinate vectors A* x_i where x _ i are the vectors from gamma
thanks!
 
The original basis here is otherwise unspecified. Just assume that it's some other basis (besides [itex]\gamma[/itex]).

As you say, [itex]\left[ L_A \right]_\gamma[/itex] is the linear transformation corresponding to the matrix A in the original basis, but with respect to the basis [itex]\gamma[/itex] instead.

If you were in the original basis and somebody came up with a vector u and asked you to do the linear transformation, you could do that easily, right? Just give them back Au. Now someone is coming up to you with a vector in the new basis v, and wants the result of applying the linear transformation in the new basis ([itex]\gamma[/itex]). So if we can take v back to the old basis, apply A, then bring the result back to the new basis, we will have their answer.

This is where Q comes in. So now, show that Q-1 and Q do these things.
 
thanks, I have another question: it says that the j-th column of Q is the j-th vector of gamma.. but Q is a matrix , so it's the jth vector of gamma under what basis coordinates?
the matrix Q would be in the coordinates of B' if Q is B -> B', so are we looking for gamma vectors with respect to gamma ? thanks :)
 
The vectors in [itex]\gamma[/itex] would be in terms of the old basis.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
0
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 27 ·
Replies
27
Views
4K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K