MHB Proving Span of $\mathbb{R}^2$ Using Sets of Vectors

Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
I'm given the example that the space $\mathbb{R}^2$ is spanned by each of the following set of vectors: $$\left\{i, j\right\}$$, $$\left\{i, j, i+j\right\}$$, and $$\left\{0, i, -i, -j, i+j\right\}$$.

However, it's not obvious to me how. Let $i = (s, t)$ and $j= (u, v)$ then $\left\{i, j\right\}$ means $a(s,t)+b(u, v) $ for $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$, which belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Is this correct? If so, then I could also say since $i = (s, t)$ and $j= (u, v)$ then $i+j = (s+u, t+v)$ so $\left\{i, j, i+j\right\}$ means $a(s,t)+b(u, v)+c(s+u, t+v) $ for $a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}$, which belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Similarly, for the last one $\left\{0, i, -i, -j, i+j\right\}$ $= a(0, 0)+b(s, t)+c(-s, -t)+d(-u, -v)+e(s+u, t+v)$ for $a,b,c,d,e \in \mathbb{R}$ which also belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$.

------------------edit---------------------

I'm starting to think it means that any $(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2$ can written in the form $a(s, t)+b(u,v)$ for $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$

But how do I prove this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually, $i = (1,0)$ and $j = (0,1)$, in which case $(x,y) = (x,0) + (0,y) = x(1,0) + y(0,1) = x i + yj$ for all $x,y\in \Bbb R$. So then $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by $i$ and $j$. In particular, $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by $i$, $j$, and $i + j$ ($(x,y) = xi + yj + 0(i + j))$. Finally, given $(x,y)\in \Bbb R^2$, $(x,y) = 1(0) + x i + 0(-i) - y(-j) + 0(i + j)$; this implies $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by the vectors $0$, $i$, $-i$, $-j$, $i + j$.

You can't have in general that $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by any two vectors. For example, $\Bbb R^2$ is not spanned by $(1,0)$ and $(2,0)$, since the point $(1,1)$ is not in the span of $\{(1,0), (2,0)\}$ (which is the $x$-axis). It turns out that you need are two linearly independent vectors to span $\Bbb R^2$, i.e., two vectors that are not scalar multiples of each other.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
790
  • · Replies 23 ·
Replies
23
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
867
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
728
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K