MHB Proving Span of $\mathbb{R}^2$ Using Sets of Vectors

Guest2
Messages
192
Reaction score
0
I'm given the example that the space $\mathbb{R}^2$ is spanned by each of the following set of vectors: $$\left\{i, j\right\}$$, $$\left\{i, j, i+j\right\}$$, and $$\left\{0, i, -i, -j, i+j\right\}$$.

However, it's not obvious to me how. Let $i = (s, t)$ and $j= (u, v)$ then $\left\{i, j\right\}$ means $a(s,t)+b(u, v) $ for $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$, which belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Is this correct? If so, then I could also say since $i = (s, t)$ and $j= (u, v)$ then $i+j = (s+u, t+v)$ so $\left\{i, j, i+j\right\}$ means $a(s,t)+b(u, v)+c(s+u, t+v) $ for $a,b,c \in \mathbb{R}$, which belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$. Similarly, for the last one $\left\{0, i, -i, -j, i+j\right\}$ $= a(0, 0)+b(s, t)+c(-s, -t)+d(-u, -v)+e(s+u, t+v)$ for $a,b,c,d,e \in \mathbb{R}$ which also belongs to the span of $\mathbb{R}^2$.

------------------edit---------------------

I'm starting to think it means that any $(x, y) \in \mathbb{R}^2$ can written in the form $a(s, t)+b(u,v)$ for $a,b \in \mathbb{R}$

But how do I prove this?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Usually, $i = (1,0)$ and $j = (0,1)$, in which case $(x,y) = (x,0) + (0,y) = x(1,0) + y(0,1) = x i + yj$ for all $x,y\in \Bbb R$. So then $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by $i$ and $j$. In particular, $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by $i$, $j$, and $i + j$ ($(x,y) = xi + yj + 0(i + j))$. Finally, given $(x,y)\in \Bbb R^2$, $(x,y) = 1(0) + x i + 0(-i) - y(-j) + 0(i + j)$; this implies $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by the vectors $0$, $i$, $-i$, $-j$, $i + j$.

You can't have in general that $\Bbb R^2$ is spanned by any two vectors. For example, $\Bbb R^2$ is not spanned by $(1,0)$ and $(2,0)$, since the point $(1,1)$ is not in the span of $\{(1,0), (2,0)\}$ (which is the $x$-axis). It turns out that you need are two linearly independent vectors to span $\Bbb R^2$, i.e., two vectors that are not scalar multiples of each other.
 
I asked online questions about Proposition 2.1.1: The answer I got is the following: I have some questions about the answer I got. When the person answering says: ##1.## Is the map ##\mathfrak{q}\mapsto \mathfrak{q} A _\mathfrak{p}## from ##A\setminus \mathfrak{p}\to A_\mathfrak{p}##? But I don't understand what the author meant for the rest of the sentence in mathematical notation: ##2.## In the next statement where the author says: How is ##A\to...
The following are taken from the two sources, 1) from this online page and the book An Introduction to Module Theory by: Ibrahim Assem, Flavio U. Coelho. In the Abelian Categories chapter in the module theory text on page 157, right after presenting IV.2.21 Definition, the authors states "Image and coimage may or may not exist, but if they do, then they are unique up to isomorphism (because so are kernels and cokernels). Also in the reference url page above, the authors present two...
##\textbf{Exercise 10}:## I came across the following solution online: Questions: 1. When the author states in "that ring (not sure if he is referring to ##R## or ##R/\mathfrak{p}##, but I am guessing the later) ##x_n x_{n+1}=0## for all odd $n$ and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible, so that ##x_n=0##" 2. How does ##x_nx_{n+1}=0## implies that ##x_{n+1}## is invertible and ##x_n=0##. I mean if the quotient ring ##R/\mathfrak{p}## is an integral domain, and ##x_{n+1}## is invertible then...
Back
Top