Proving Stirling's formula help

  • Thread starter Thread starter Physicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Formula
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
6 replies · 5K views
Physicist
Messages
43
Reaction score
0
proving Stirling's formula.. help please

How can I prove Stirling's formula?

n!= integral from 0 to inf. exp(-t) t^n dt= n^n exp(-n) (2 pi n)^0.5

there's a hint to use the substitution t=ny & ln(1+y) = y- 0.5 y^2

I tried to use it but I couldn't intgrate.. I tried integrating by parts but it became more complicated.. :frown:

Can anyone help?

(How can I write the mathematical symbols here?)

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Physicist said:
How can I prove Stirling's formula?

n!= integral from 0 to inf. exp(-t) t^n dt= n^n exp(-n) (2 pi n)^0.5

there's a hint to use the substitution t=ny & ln(1+y) = y- 0.5 y^2

I tried to use it but I couldn't intgrate.. I tried integrating by parts but it became more complicated.. :frown:

Can anyone help?

(How can I write the mathematical symbols here?)

Thanks
Try:
http://www.sosmath.com/calculus/sequence/stirling/stirling.html

AM
 
Another approach would be to use the method of steepest descent. Basically, you can find where [itex]t^n e^{-t}[/itex] is a maximum and observe that the most significant contribution to the integral comes from near that maximum.
 
Thanks for helping.. but I should uuse the substitution t=ny..

HELP PLZ
 


How can I find equivalent Frenkel defects in the crystal through the equivalent Stralink