Proving Subsets of Rn: Steve's Questions Answered

  • Thread starter Thread starter shutoutsteve
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Proof Subspaces
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving whether specific sets are subsets of R^n, particularly focusing on the definitions and properties of subspaces in vector spaces. The original poster presents two sets and expresses uncertainty about how to approach the proof, citing a lack of examples in their textbook.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants question the clarity of the problem statement and the definitions provided in the textbook. There are discussions about the necessity of understanding the definition of a subspace and whether the original poster has accurately interpreted the assignment. Some suggest looking up definitions and emphasize the importance of careful reading.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging in clarifying the definitions related to subspaces and discussing the original poster's understanding of the problem. Some have provided insights into the properties that define a subspace, while others encourage the original poster to revisit the textbook definitions for better comprehension.

Contextual Notes

There is mention of a vague definition in the textbook and a lack of examples that resemble the problem at hand. Additionally, it is noted that the class will cover this topic soon, and there seems to be a general struggle among peers regarding the assignment.

shutoutsteve
Messages
8
Reaction score
0
a) {(x1,x2,x3) | x1+x2 ≥ 0}

b) {x∈R3 |proj(1,1,1) (x) ∈ Sp({(1,1,1)})}

Prove the set is or is not a subset of R n

I have no idea how to solve this. Our textbook gives NO examples of how to prove these

Please help me get started, a related example would be great too. :)
Thanks- Steve
 
Physics news on Phys.org
shutoutsteve said:
a) {(x1,x2,x3) | x1+x2 ≥ 0}

b) {x∈R3 |proj(1,1,1) (x) ∈ Sp({(1,1,1)})}

Prove the set is or is not a subset of R n
Are you sure this is what you have to prove?
shutoutsteve said:
I have no idea how to solve this. Our textbook gives NO examples of how to prove these

Please help me get started, a related example would be great too. :)
Thanks- Steve

Does your book have any definitions that are related to these problems?
 
Mark44 said:
Are you sure this is what you have to prove?


Does your book have any definitions that are related to these problems?

That is what my book says exactly. :(
 
Do you understand that you have just said that your book contains that one problem and a lot of blank pages? I don't believe for a moment that your book does not have a definition of "subspace". Try looking in the index!
 
shutoutsteve said:
That is what my book says exactly. :(
I don't believe that your book says "Prove the set is or is not a subset of R n"
 
...oops...
subSPACE... my bad lol
...
Our book does have a definition, but it is very vague, about a paragraph long and then it goes on about something else. There aren't even any examples that LOOK like this in our book. It's ok though because we are covering this Monday in class, and 14/65 people handed in the assignment with that question because nobody understood it.
 
Look at the definition.
Definitions in math books are almost never "very vague". On the contrary, they are generally very precise. For many types of problems, if you understand the definition, you don't really need an example.

If you take a careful look at the definition of a subspace of a vector space, and make an honest effort at this problem I'm sure you'll get some help from us.
 
A subset, U, of a vector space V, is a subspace if and only if
1) It is non-empty. (Equivalently, it contains the 0 vector)
2) It is closed under addition. (If x and y are in the set so is x+ y)
3) It is closed under scalaar multiplication. (If x is in the set so is ax for any a in the underlying field [here, the real numbers])

I'll be that's essentially what your book has.

Which of the sets given in a and b above satisfy those?
 
HallsofIvy said:
A subset, U, of a vector space V, is a subspace if and only if
1) It is non-empty. (Equivalently, it contains the 0 vector)
2) It is closed under addition. (If x and y are in the set so is x+ y)
3) It is closed under scalaar multiplication. (If x is in the set so is ax for any a in the underlying field [here, the real numbers])

I'll be that's essentially what your book has.

That is the definition we received today in class, which was similar to what the textbook said, except it wasn't laid out as neat and orderly as this one. I now understand the topic.

I apologize for being stubborn earlier about the textbook quotes. I realize now all i needed was this definition, one that I could understand given the material covered so far in class.
Thanks
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 26 ·
Replies
26
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K