Proving \sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k} = \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}

  • Thread starter Thread starter courtrigrad
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Sum
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the formula \(\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k} = \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}\) using properties of summation. Participants are exploring various approaches to derive this expression.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Mathematical reasoning, Problem interpretation

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the hint suggesting to express the sum as \((1-x)\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k}\) and question how this factorization is achieved. They also consider rewriting \(x^{k}\) in different forms and explore the implications of multiplying the sum by \(1-x\). Additionally, one participant introduces an alternative approach by defining \(S\) and manipulating it through multiplication by \(x\).

Discussion Status

The discussion is active with participants sharing different methods and questioning the steps involved. Some guidance has been provided regarding the manipulation of the sum, but there is no explicit consensus on a single approach yet.

Contextual Notes

Participants are working under the constraints of homework rules, focusing on deriving the proof without directly providing solutions. There is an emphasis on understanding the properties of summation involved in the problem.

courtrigrad
Messages
1,236
Reaction score
2
I want to show that [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k} = \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}[/tex] using the additive, homogeneous, and telescoping properties of summation. In a hint it says to write the sum as [tex](1-x)\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k}[/tex]. How did they arrive at this? Did they factor out the [tex]1-x[/tex]. I don't see how they did this. I would then write [tex]x^{k}[/tex] as [tex]x^{k+1} - (x-1)^{k+1}[/tex]. Then what?

Thanks
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
courtrigrad said:
I want to show that [tex]\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k} = \frac{1-x^{n+1}}{1-x}[/tex] using the additive, homogeneous, and telescoping properties of summation. In a hint it says to write the sum as [tex](1-x)\sum_{k=0}^{n} x^{k}[/tex]. How did they arrive at this? Did they factor out the [tex]1-x[/tex]. I don't see how they did this. I would then write [tex]x^{k}[/tex] as [tex]x^{k+1} - (x-1)^{k+1}[/tex]. Then what?

Thanks

Let the sum be represented by S. You want to find a neat expression for S.

One way to do that is to multiply S by (1-x). List out a few terms of S (maybe the first four, then "..." then the last two terms). Now multiply that by (1-x) term by term. Add up the like powers (same exponent of x) and see what happens. You will end up very quickly at the required proof.
 
Another way is that:
Let:
[tex]S = \sum_{n = 1} ^ k (x ^ n)[/tex]
Now multiply both sides by x, we have:
[tex]x S = \sum_{n = 1} ^ k (x ^ {n + 1}) = \sum_{n = 2} ^ {k + 1} (x ^ n)[/tex]
Now, from the 2 equations above, what can you do to get (1 - x) S?
Can you go from here? :)
 
Yup, I got it.

Thanks :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
9
Views
2K