MHB Proving that a module can be decomposed as a direct sum of submodules

kalish1
Messages
79
Reaction score
0
Letting $X$ be a ring and $K$ be an $X$-module, I need to show that **if** $K \cong A \times B$ for some $X$-modules $A,B$, **then** $\exists$ submodules $M'$ and $N'$ of $K$ such that:

$K=M' \oplus N'$

$M' \cong A$

$N' \cong B.$----------I understand the concepts of internal and external direct sum of modules, and I showed that if $K = M \oplus N$ for $M,N$ submodules of $K$, then $K \cong M \times N.$ (I showed the isomorphism by defining a well-defined map, and then showing that the map is a surjective homomorphism, followed by the kernel being $\{0\}$ and applying the First Isomorphism Theorem.)

But I have tried doing this problem for hours now, and have not been able to crack it. How should I begin?

This question has been crossposted here: abstract algebra - Proving that a module can be decomposed as a direct sum of submodules - Mathematics Stack Exchange
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Hi kalish,

Let $\phi$ be is isomorphism from $A\times B$ onto $K$. Set $M' = \phi(A \times 0)$ and $N' = \phi(0 \times B)$. Since $M'$ and $N'$ are homomorphic images of submodules of $A\times B$, $M'$ and $N'$ are submodules of $K$. Given $x\in K$, there exists a unique element $(a,b) \in A\times B$ such that $x = \phi(a,b)$. Since $(a,b) = (a,0) + (0,b)$ and $\phi$ is a homomorphism, $\phi(a,b) = \phi(a,0) + \phi(0,b) \in M' + N'$. The representation of $x$ as $\phi(a,0) + \phi(0,b)$ is unique by uniqueness of $(a,b)$. Thus $x \in M' \oplus N'$. Since $x$ was an arbitrary point of $K$, $K \subseteq M' \oplus N'$ and thus $K = M' \oplus N'$.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K