Proving that central force is conservative and getting the energy

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that a central force is conservative and calculating the potential energy associated with it. The force is defined as F=-f(r) \frac{\vec{r}}{r}, with a specific case where f(r)=\frac{a}{r^{2}}. Participants are exploring the implications of this force on potential energy calculations.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the calculation of potential energy using different approaches, including the use of force components and integrals. There is a focus on the correct treatment of variables and the implications of treating r as a function of x, y, and z. Questions arise about the correctness of integrating with respect to different variables and the treatment of constants.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants providing feedback on each other's calculations and methods. Some guidance has been offered regarding the integration process and variable substitution, but there is no explicit consensus on the final form of the potential energy expression. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being explored.

Contextual Notes

Participants mention missing lectures, which may impact their understanding of the integration techniques required for this problem. There is also a discussion about the choice of limits for integration and the implications of defining potential energy at infinity.

aquance
Messages
28
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Hey, sorry in advance if something I write is unclear but I am not native English speaker.

I have a central force that is defined as F=-f(r) \frac{\vec{r}}{r} where f(r) is some function of distance and \vec{r}=(x,y,z). I have to calculate potential energy when f(r)=\frac{a}{r^{2}} and I have to use \vec{r}d\vec{r}=\frac{dr^{2}}{2}

Homework Equations


The Attempt at a Solution



I wrote Force F as \left( -\frac{f(r)x}{r}, -\frac{f(r)y}{r},-\frac{f(r)z}{r} \right) can I or can I not do it?
Calculated the curl, it was 0 so it is conservative. Now I substituted f(r) and got \left( -\frac{ax}{r^{3}}, -\frac{ay}{r^{3}},-\frac{az}{r^{3}} \right)

To calculate potential energy I have 3 equations:

-\frac{ax}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dx}
-\frac{ay}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dy}
-\frac{az}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dz}

and the result is -\frac{a}{2r^{3}}\left(x^{2}+y^{2}+z^{2}\right) + C. I didn't use the \vec{r}d\vec{r}=\frac{dr^{2}}{2} so I guess I did something wrongWhen you reply please tell me where and why did I make a mistake and how to correct it.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
I think you missed negatives in your calculations when solving for E. (Since dE/dx = -Fx etc..)

Note also ##x^2 + y^2 + z^2 = r^2##.

Did you mean to write ##\vec r \cdot d\vec r = dr^2/2##?

Then $$U = - \int \vec F \cdot d\vec r = - \int \frac{f(r)}{r} \vec r \cdot d\vec r \dots$$
And $$\int \frac{dr^2}{r^3} \propto \frac{1}{r}.$$

So yes, your method is fine, but maybe they wanted you to use the approach above.
 
Yes I forgot about the minuses, thanks for noticing that. Yes I meant what you wrote with the r*dr.

Thanks, I thought my method is incorrect :)
 
The only mistake I can find is an extra factor of (1/2) in your final answer that shouldn't be there. It is possible to solve the problem the way you did (after fixing that mistake), but it is easier to solve it using the identity provided in the problem. Try it...
 
Why is 1/2 a mistake?

When I have the -\frac{ax}{r^{3}} = \frac{dE}{dx} it turns into

-\frac{ax}{r^{3}}dx = dE

-\int\frac{ax}{r^{3}}dx = \int dE

E=-\frac{ax^{2}}{2r^{3}} + C
 
The integral is incorrect because r is a function of x. It cannot be treated as a constant. r2 = x2 = y2 = z2.
 
but \vec{r} is a function of x, r is is simply a scalar ? I would have tried the method mentioned here but I have no idea how to even start to be honest ;p I've missed some lectures about how to solve integrals with vectors and such
 
aquance said:
but \vec{r} is a function of x, r is is simply a scalar ? I would have tried the method mentioned here but I have no idea how to even start to be honest ;p I've missed some lectures about how to solve integrals with vectors and such

Missing lectures is a bad idea. r is indeed a scalar, but it is not a constant scalar. It is a function of x, y, and z. Try to change the variable of integration from x to r.
 
Okay so I can see how r^2=x^2+y^2+z^2, but I don't know how to change the variable of integration, I can't just substitute sqrt(r^2-y^2-z^2) for x...
 
  • #10
aquance said:
Okay so I can see how r^2=x^2+y^2+z^2, but I don't know how to change the variable of integration, I can't just substitute sqrt(r^2-y^2-z^2) for x...

Yes you can. What do you get for dx?

Tip: It's easier if you use implicit differentiation.
 
  • #11
Okay, so
x=\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}

then

dx=\frac{r}{\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr

to integral now

ax∫\frac{1}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr

?
 
  • #12
You made the same mistake again. You pulled the x out of the integral. You can't do that because x is a function of r. Just substitute the expression for x provided at the top of your post.
 
  • #13
Ahaaa! Thanks :)

a∫\frac{x}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr =

a∫\frac{\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}}{r^{2}\sqrt{r^{2}-y^{2}-z^{2}}} dr =

-\frac{a}{r} + C

So that would mean that E = -\frac{3a}{r}+ C

Is it correct? Or should it be just -\frac{a}{r}+ C
 
Last edited:
  • #14
it's just -a/r + C.
 
  • #15
You can choose the potential zero at infinity, integrate from ##\vec r_## to ∞.


V(\vec {r})=\int_{\vec r}^{∞}{\frac{a}{r'^3}\vec r' \cdot \vec{dr'}}

You can write r'dr= 0.5 d(r2) and introduce the variable u=r2.

The integral becomes\int{0.5 \frac{a}{u^{3/2} }du} What do you get?

Substitute back u=r2 and take the limits.ehild
 
Last edited:
  • #16
So it's -(0-\frac{a}{r}) = \frac{a}{r} ? Why do we integrate from r1 to r2, and why do we take r2 as infinity?
 
  • #17
The potential difference is the integral of the negative force between two points, r1 and r2. If you choose r2 at infinity, where the potential is zero, you get the potential at r1.
I edited my post a bit.

ehild
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
3K
Replies
64
Views
6K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K