Proving that e^{ikx} is primary with weight (h=\hbar = \alpha k^2/4)

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Weight
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that the expression e^{ikx} is primary with a specific weight, utilizing normal ordering and the Wick theorem in quantum field theory (QFT). The transition from the expression involving the partial derivative of X(z) to its normal ordered form is clarified through the application of Wick's theorem. The key relationship established is that the normal ordered product of fields leads to a simplification involving the derivative and the correlation function, specifically showing that :∂X(z)X(w): equals -α'/(2(z-w)). This proof is essential for understanding the properties of primary fields in the context of conformal field theory.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of quantum field theory (QFT) principles
  • Familiarity with normal ordering in quantum mechanics
  • Knowledge of Wick's theorem and its applications
  • Basic concepts of conformal field theory (CFT)
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the application of Wick's theorem in quantum field theory
  • Explore the implications of normal ordering in conformal field theory
  • Learn about primary fields and their significance in CFT
  • Investigate correlation functions and their role in QFT
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, particularly those specializing in quantum field theory and conformal field theory, as well as students and researchers looking to deepen their understanding of primary fields and normal ordering techniques.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
162
Homework Statement
I can't understand the line of reasoning used by David Tong (on its lectures of CFT).
Relevant Equations
.'
1676395218266.png


Where

##:## really means normal ordered, in the sense that ##:A(w)B(z): = \lim_{w \to z} \left ( A(w)B(z) - \langle A(w)B(z) \rangle \right )##

##\partial X(z) = \frac{\partial X(z)}{\partial z}##

How do we go form the first line to the second one?? I am not understanding it!

it seems to me that we start with
$$\partial X(z) : X(w)^n : = \partial X(z) : X(w)^{n-1} X(w) :$$
Then, for some reason

$$\partial X(z) : X(w)^{n-1} X(w) : \rightarrow n X(w)^{n-1} :\partial X(z) X(w): $$

Since

$$: \partial X(z) X(w) = \frac{-\alpha'}{2 (z-w)} $$

We got the answer, but how?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
You must use Wick theorem, which is the same as in ordinary QFT.
 
  • Care
Likes   Reactions: LCSphysicist

Similar threads

  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
6K