Proving that f is bounded on R

  • Thread starter Thread starter vikkisut88
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Bounded
Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 3K views
vikkisut88
Messages
34
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that f: R -> R is continuous on R and that lim (x -> [tex]\infty[/tex]+)(f(x) = 0) and lim (x -> [tex]\infty[/tex]-)(f(x)=0).
Prove that f is bounded on R


Homework Equations


I have got the proof of when f is continuous on [a,b] then f is bounded on[a,b] but I'm unsure as to whether I can use this proof for this particular question.

The Attempt at a Solution


My attempt is merely the proof I speak of from above.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
but I can't just assume it is that specific function surely? plus i have to prove it's bounded, not unbounded?!?
 
vikkisut88 said:

Homework Statement


Suppose that f: R -> R is continuous on R and that lim (x -> [tex]\infty[/tex]+)(f(x) = 0) and lim (x -> [tex]\infty[/tex]-)(f(x)=0).
Prove that f is bounded on R

Using the definitions of the above limits you should be able to show that f is bounded on sets of the form [b,+[tex]\infty[/tex]) and (-[tex]\infty[/tex],a] for some a, b.

vikkisut88 said:

Homework Equations


I have got the proof of when f is continuous on [a,b] then f is bounded on[a,b] but I'm unsure as to whether I can use this proof for this particular question.

Then use the result for compact intervals [a,b] to complete the proof that f is bounded on all of R.