Proving that ##\lim [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] = \frac{1}{4}##

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hall
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Limit
Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving that the limit of the expression \(\lim [\sqrt{4n^2 + n} - 2n] = \frac{1}{4}\) using epsilon-delta arguments. Participants explore the challenges of isolating \(n\) and rationalizing the denominator to simplify the limit expression. They emphasize the importance of estimating the original expression to allow \(n\) to vary freely and discuss the necessity of using epsilon-delta definitions in calculus proofs. Alternative approaches are suggested, highlighting the relationship between the expressions as \(n\) approaches infinity. The conversation underscores the mathematical rigor required in limit proofs while debating the relevance of epsilon-delta methods in this context.
Hall
Messages
351
Reaction score
87
Homework Statement
Prove the limit: ##\lim [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] = \frac{1}{4}##.
Relevant Equations
I will use epsilon-delta definition.
Discussion: Assume that we can make ##\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n]- \frac{1}{4}\big| ## to fall down any given number. Given an arbitrarily small ##\varepsilon \gt 0##, we assume
$$
\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] - \frac{1}{4}\big| \lt \varepsilon $$
$$
\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n]\big| \lt \varepsilon + 1/4$$
Now, we have two problems here, first that we cannot fully isolate ##n## and second ##n## doesn't occur in denominator as in fractional sequences. Without hurting anyone's feelings we would try to solve the second issue first:
## \text{Let's irrationalise the denominator of the expression of the given sequence}##
##\frac{ \left(\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n\right) ~\left( \sqrt{4n^2 +n} + 2n\right)}{ \sqrt{4n^2 +n} +2n}##
##\frac{n }{ \sqrt{4n^2 +n} + 2n} = \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 +1/n} - 2}##

Let's simply our expression ## \big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] - \frac{1}{4}\big| = \big| \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 +1/n} - 2} - 1/4\big| = 1/4 - \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 +1/n} - 2}~~~\text{ for all} n \in \mathbf{N}##.

Now, it's time for solving the first issue, that is to make ##n## floatable, for that we will estimate our original expression by something bigger than that (this is my official argument, that I claim the following expression to be less that epsilon)
$$
1/4 - \frac{1}{ \sqrt{4 +1/n} - 2} \lt 1/4 - \frac{1}{4 +1/n +2} = 1/4 - \frac{1}{6+ 1/n} \lt \varepsilon
$$
## 1/4 - \frac{1}{6+ 1/n} \lt \varepsilon ##
##1/4 - \varepsilon \lt \frac{1}{6+1/n} ##
##6/4 - 6 \varepsilon + 1/n ( 1/4 - \varepsilon) \lt 1##
##1/n ( 1/4 - \varepsilon) \lt 6 \varepsilon - 1/2 ##
##n \gt \frac{2 (1/4 - \varepsilon) }{12 \varepsilon -1}##

Formal Proof: (I'm putting it in spoiler so as to help you, otherwise the post will become so lengthy and mobile users will find it hard to scroll such a length)
For any given arbitrarily small ##\varepsilon \gt 0##, take ## N = \frac{2 (1/4 - \varepsilon) }{12 \varepsilon -1}##
##n \gt N \implies n \gt \frac{2 (1/4 - \varepsilon) }{12 \varepsilon -1}##
##1/n \lt \frac{12 \varepsilon -1}{2 (1/4 - \varepsilon)}##
## 1/n ( 1/4 - \varepsilon) \lt 6\varepsilon -1/2##
##6/4 - 6\varepsilon + 1/n(1/4 - \varepsilon) \lt 1 ##
##1/4 - \varepsilon \lt \frac{1}{6 + 1/n}##
##1/4 - \frac{1}{4 + 1/n +2} \lt \varepsilon##
##1/4 - \frac{ 1}{\sqrt{ 4 +1/n} +2 } \lt 1/4 - \frac{1}{4 + 1/n +2} \lt \varepsilon##
##1/4 - \frac{ 1}{\sqrt{ 4 +1/n} +2 } \lt \varepsilon ##
##\big| \frac{ 1}{\sqrt{ 4 +1/n} +2 } - 1/4 \big| \lt \varepsilon##
##\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] - 1/4 \big| \lt \varepsilon##

Thus, we can the expression ## \big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] - 1/4 \big|## to fall below any given number.

So, basically there were three important steps:
1. First get ##n## in denominator.
2. Estimate the original expression by something else, so as to make ##n## to move freely.
3. Judiciously removing the bars of absolute values.

Now, I seek your solemn opinions, gentlemen.
 
  • Like
Likes Delta2
Physics news on Phys.org
Well that's all very nice but I don't understand your insist on the epsilon-delta proofs. They make the solution of this type of problems. an excercise in solving inequalities which is not exactly the main theme of calculus.

Though ok, I have to say that many proofs of theorems of calculus are done with the epsilon-delta method.
 
  • Like
Likes Hall
Is there a requirement for this problem that the definition of the limit must be used? If not, it's much simpler to use limit properties.
$$\sqrt{4n^2 + n} - 2n = \frac{(\sqrt{4n^2 + n} - 2n)(\sqrt{4n^2 + n} - 2n)}{\sqrt{4n^2 + n} + 2n}$$
$$=\frac n {n(\sqrt{4 + 1/n} + 2} = \frac 1 {\sqrt{4 + 1/n} + 2}$$
This process is called "rationalizing the numerator", not irrationalizing it.
The first and last expressions in the equation above are equal for all n > 0, so they are equal in the limit as n grows arbitrarily large.
Therefore, ##\lim_{n \to \infty}\sqrt{4n^2 + n} - 2n = \lim_{n \to \infty}\frac 1 {\sqrt{4 + 1/n} + 2} = \frac 1 4##.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Delta2 and PeroK
Delta2 said:
Well that's all very nice but I don't understand your insist on the epsilon-delta proofs. They make the solution of this type of problems. an excercise in solving inequalities which is not exactly the main theme of calculus.

Though ok, I have to say that many proofs of theorems of calculus are done with the epsilon-delta method.
Sorry, I didn’t mention that it is an epsilon-delta exercise, occurring in Ross’ Analysis.
 
  • Love
Likes Delta2
Hall said:
Sorry, I didn’t mention that it is an epsilon-delta exercise, occurring in Ross’ Analysis.
I don't have this textbook. Does the fact that the exercise is in Ross mean that it must be done using the limit definition? Note that for this problem ##\delta## is not used.

Hall said:
Given an arbitrarily small
##\varepsilon \gt 0##, we assume
$$
\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n] - \frac{1}{4}\big| \lt \varepsilon $$
$$
\big| [\sqrt{4n^2 +n} - 2n]\big| \lt \varepsilon + 1/4$$
This is not quite right. If ##|x - a| < \epsilon##, then ##\epsilon - a < x < \epsilon + a##
 
  • Like
Likes SammyS and Delta2
Mark44 said:
I don't have this textbook. Does the fact that the exercise is in Ross mean that it must be done using the limit definition? Note that for this problem ##\delta## is not used.This is not quite right. If ##|x - a| < \epsilon##, then ##\epsilon - a < x < \epsilon + a##
I think for these two inequalities of the OP the second is a consequence of the first but the first is not consequence of the 2nd. In other words ##(1)\Rightarrow(2)## but NOT ##(2)\Rightarrow (1)##
 
There is an alternative approach. For all ##n## we have ##\sqrt{4n^2+n} < 2n + \frac 1 4##. It is enough to show, therefore, given ##\epsilon## that for large enough ##n## we have ##2n +\frac 1 4 - \epsilon < \sqrt{4n^2 +n}##.

You can work on that.
 
Last edited:
  • Informative
  • Skeptical
Likes Hall and Delta2
PS the idea is to use the basic property of real numbers that for ##x,y > 0## we have ##x < y## iff ##x^2 < y^2##.
 
  • Informative
Likes Delta2
PeroK said:
There is an alternative approach. For all ##n## we have ##\sqrt{4n^2+n} < 2n + \frac 1 4##. It is enough to show, therefore, given ##\epsilon## that for large enough ##n## we have ##2n +\frac 1 4 - \epsilon < \sqrt{4n^2 +n}##.

You can work on that.
The idea is quite interesting, you seem to suggest that at very large ##n## the expression ##\sqrt{4n^2 +n}## is so close to ##2n +1/4## that even a slight deduction in ##2n +1/4## makes it less than ##\sqrt{4n^2 +n}##.

To assure that we can make ##\sqrt{4n^2 +n}## very close to ##2n +1/4##, we will work out for such an ##n##, so, that our claim is true.
$$
2n +1/4 -\varepsilon \lt \sqrt{4n^2 +n}$$
##8n +1 - \varepsilon \lt 4 \sqrt{4n^2 +n}##
Squaring both sides and cancelling would yield
##
1+ \varepsilon^2 -3 \varepsilon \lt 16n \varepsilon##
##
\frac{(1+\varepsilon)^2}{16 \varepsilon} \lt n##

So, for ##n## larger than that, the difference between the two expressions become less than ##\varepsilon##.

I got a question for you: how did you come up with such a fine idea that the algebra got reduced to almost nothing?
 
  • #10
That's not quite the idea I had in mind:
$$(2n +\frac 1 4 - \epsilon)^2 = 4n^2 + n - 4n\epsilon + (\frac 1 4 - \epsilon)^2$$and then it should be clear.

I don't know where ideas come from. That approach seems to me to capture the essence of the required inequality.