Proving that n-th root of n is irrational

  • Thread starter Thread starter annoymage
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Irrational Root
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the n-th root of n is irrational for n greater than 1. Participants explore the implications of assuming that this root is rational and examine the relationships between integers involved in the proof.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants consider the assumption that the n-th root of n can be expressed as a fraction of two integers. They discuss the implications of this assumption and explore various cases, including when the integers are greater than, equal to, or less than one.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the proof, with participants sharing insights about factors and common divisors. Some have identified contradictions arising from their assumptions, while others are questioning the validity of certain steps and seeking further clarification.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that n is assumed to be a positive integer and discuss the implications of n being prime or composite in the context of finding common factors.

annoymage
Messages
360
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



if n>1, prove that [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] irrational

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



so suppose it is rational, so i know [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] must be integer, say p

then [tex]n=p^n[/tex] and how do i prove this is not true??

i can prove if p>1 then [tex]p^n>n[/tex] for all n>1 by induction, and when p=1 its clearly contradiction, so i don't know the case when p<1

or rather someone have other easy way to prove the question? clue please T_T
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org


annoymage said:

Homework Statement



if n>1, prove that [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] irrational

Homework Equations



n/a

The Attempt at a Solution



so suppose it is rational, so i know [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] must be integer, say p

I assume by your notation that n is a positive integer.

What you know is that [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] can be written as the quotient of two integers p and q having no common factors.
 


LCKurtz said:
What you know is that [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}[/tex] can be written as the quotient of two integers p and q having no common factors.

i know, but i also know that if [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}=\frac{p}{q}\ ,\ gcd(p,q)=1[/tex] then q=1

but heyyyyyy, i realized something

LCKurtz said:
I assume by your notation that n is a positive integer.

when i assume [tex]\sqrt[n]{n}=p[/tex] i know p must be positive

so i already prove it right? since [tex]n=p^n[/tex] is a contradiction because [tex]p^n[/tex] is always greater than n if p>1, and if p=1 then [tex]n \neq 1^n[/tex] is it right?
 


What he's saying that, suppose that [tex]n^{1/n}[/tex] is rational, then there is a p and a q (with no common factors) such that:
[tex] n^{1/n}=\frac{p}{q}\Rightarrow p^{n}=nq^{n}[/tex]
Now you look for how p^{n} is made up, what factors does it have?
 


ahhhhh i see so i have to find common factor other than 1,

[tex]n|p^n[/tex] , etc etc... , then [tex]n|q^n[/tex], then since [tex]gcd(a,b)=1[/tex], then [tex]gcd(a^n,b^n)=1[/tex] so [tex]n|1[/tex] so n=1, still can't find common factor T_T more clue
 


you know that
[tex] n|p^{n}\Rightarrow n|p[/tex]
So we can write [tex]p=\alpha n[/tex], so...
 


hunt_mat said:
you know that
[tex] n|p^{n}\Rightarrow n|p[/tex]

wait is that true? i got counter example n=4, p=2
right?
 


Then there is a factor of n which is also factor of p, and factors of p are want you want. You're correct of course, well done for noticing, If n is prime, does my solution work? If n isn't prime then it can be broken down into prime factors.
 


ahh i see i see

if n is prime then n is the new common factor

If not, n has a prime factor, say d, d l n, then bla bla bla d is the new common factor right? thankssssssssss
 
  • #10


You can get a great deal of the information of how to prove should go by examining the proof the square root of 2 is irrational.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
5K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K