Proving that the Composition of Two Self-Adjoint Operators is Self-Adjoint

CrazyIvan
Messages
45
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Prove or give a counterexample: the product of any two self-adjoint operators on a finite-dimensional inner-product space is self-adjoint.

Homework Equations


The only two equations I've used so far are:
[tex]\left\langle T v, w\right\rangle = \left\langle v, T^{*}w\right\rangle[/tex]
and
[tex]\left(T \circ S \right)^{*} = S^{*} \circ T^{*}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


I started with the definition of adjoint, using [tex]T \circ S[/tex] :
[tex]\left\langle \left(T \circ S \right) v, w \right\rangle = \left\langle v, \left(T \circ S \right)^{*} w \right\rangle[/tex]
Using the second relevant equation, I got
[tex]\left\langle \left(T \circ S \right) v, w \right\rangle = \left\langle v, \left(S \circ T \right) w \right\rangle[/tex]
So the composition is self-adjoint only if [tex]T[/tex] and [tex]S[/tex] commute. But I don't know where to go from there.
Will self-adjoint operators necessarily commute?
 
on Phys.org
Take R^2 with the usual basis and inner product. Then self adjoint operators are the symmetric 2x2 matrices. Can you find two of those that don't commute? It's not that hard. When you find them also notice that their product isn't symmetric.
 
Thanks for your help!

It was, in fact, quite easy to find two such matrices. It only took a few minutes :redface: .
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 43 ·
2
Replies
43
Views
5K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K