Orthogonal operator and reflection

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the properties of a linear operator defined for a unit vector in a vector space, specifically focusing on reflection and orthogonal operators. The original poster seeks assistance with two parts of a problem involving the reflection operator and its relationship with an orthogonal operator.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • The original poster expresses uncertainty about how to approach the first part of the problem, particularly in solving the equation related to the reflection operator. Some participants suggest exploring the properties of the operator and its implications.
  • Participants discuss the implications of the operator being bijective or injective and how that relates to finding the unit vector.
  • There is a focus on understanding the eigenspace associated with the operator and the conditions under which certain vectors belong to that space.

Discussion Status

Participants are actively engaging with the problem, providing hints and exploring different aspects of the reflection operator and its properties. Some guidance has been offered regarding the relationship between the operators and the implications of orthogonality, but there is no explicit consensus on the solutions to the parts of the problem.

Contextual Notes

There is an emphasis on the definitions and properties of the operators involved, particularly regarding the orthogonality and the nature of the eigenspace. The discussion also highlights the need for further clarification on certain assumptions and definitions related to the problem.

drawar
Messages
130
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


Let ##n## be a unit vector in ##V## . Define a linear operator ##F_n## on ##V## such that
$$F_n(u) = u-2\langle u, n \rangle n \; \mathrm{for} \; u \in V.$$
##F_n## is called the reflection on ##V## along the direction of ##n##. Let ##S## be an orthogonal linear operator on ##V## and let ##W = \left\{u \in V | S(u) = u\right\}##. Suppose ##W^\perp## is not empty and ##w## is a nonzero vector in ##W^\perp##.

(a) Find a unit vector ##n## such that ##F_n(S(w))=w##.

(b) Prove that ##W \subsetneq E_1(F_n \circ S)##, where ##n## is the unit vector obtain in (a) and ##E_1(F_n \circ S)## denotes the eigenspace of ##F_n \circ S## associated with 1.

Homework Equations


##S## is orthogonal iff ##||S(u)||=||u||## for all ##u \in V##

The Attempt at a Solution


Okay I admit I have no idea how to do either of the questions but I would really appreciate some help to do (a) because without getting it done first, I wouldn't be able to proceed to (b). So right now all I can do for (a) is writing down the equation I'm supposed to solve, hoping something useful would pop up and lead me straight to the answer but it doesn't seem that easy:
$$S(w)-2 \langle S(w),n \rangle n = w.$$
Honestly I'm stuck at here, is there any way I can do about it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Perhaps not the best way but: what is ##F_n^2##, how can (a) be restated? And is there a way to recover n knowing v and ##F_n(v)##?
 
bloby said:
Perhaps not the best way but: what is ##F_n^2##, how can (a) be restated? And is there a way to recover n knowing v and ##F_n(v)##?

##F_n^2=I##, so the equation in (a) reduces to ##S(w)=F_n(w)## (- I guess this requires ##F_n## to be bijective or at least injective but I don't know how to prove it). From here ##n## can be found by subtracting ##F_n(w)## (or equivalently ##S(w)##) from ##w## followed by a normalization. Does that sound ok?
 
drawar said:
(- I guess this requires ##F_n## to be bijective or at least injective but I don't know how to prove it).

Yes. Either verify the solution found or simply use the definition of injective.

drawar said:
From here ##n## can be found by subtracting ##F_n(w)## (or equivalently ##S(w)##) from ##w## followed by a normalization. Does that sound ok?

Yes.

Is the part (b) ok?
 
Last edited:
bloby said:
Is the part (b) ok?

No, unfortunately. Would appreciate further hints if possible!
 
I gave perhaps too much hints for (a): it's not magical trick, I just figured out what ##F_n## does on a vector in ##\mathbb R^3##, (do a sketch) hence the name and the intuitions.

For (b) there are two things to prove: ##W \subset E_1(F_n \circ S)## and there is a vector ##\not\in W## that belongs to ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##.

What does it means for a vector v to be in ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##?
 
bloby said:
I gave perhaps too much hints for (a): it's not magical trick, I just figured out what ##F_n## does on a vector in ##\mathbb R^3##, (do a sketch) hence the name and the intuitions.

For (b) there are two things to prove: ##W \subset E_1(F_n \circ S)## and there is a vector ##\not\in W## that belongs to ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##.

What does it means for a vector v to be in ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##?

##E_1(F_n \circ S)=\left\{w \in V|F_n(S(w))=w\right\}##. ##W \subset E_1(F_n \circ S)## is because of the fact that ##S## is orthogonal. It remains to find a vector that ##\not\in W## but belongs to ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##, which is nothing but ##w##.
 
Last edited:
drawar said:
##E_1(F_n \circ S)=\left\{w \in V|F_n(S(w))=w\right\}##. ##W \subset E_1(F_n \circ S)## is because of the fact that ##S## is orthogonal. It remains to find a vector that ##\not\in W## but belongs to ##E_1(F_n \circ S)##, which is nothing but ##w##.

Yes, yes, and the definition of W and the fact that ##w## of (a) belongs to ##W^\perp##
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: 1 person
Yeah, that also. Thanks for being so patient with me. I really appreciate your instructive help and guidance.
 
  • #10
You're welcome :smile:
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K