Proving that the incident intensity is not the same as the sum of others

  • Thread starter Thread starter LCSphysicist
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Intensity Sum
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the relationship between the coefficients of reflection ($R$) and transmission ($T$) of electric fields, and their corresponding intensity coefficients ($r$ and $t$). The user successfully derived the equations $r = R^2$ and $t = nT^2$, where $n$ is the index of refraction of the second medium. However, confusion arises when attempting to prove that the sum of the reflected and transmitted intensities does not equal the incident intensity, despite initial assumptions suggesting otherwise. The user references a source that indicates the reflected and transmitted intensities do indeed sum to the incident intensity, highlighting a potential misunderstanding in their calculations.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of electromagnetic wave theory
  • Familiarity with reflection and transmission coefficients
  • Knowledge of the index of refraction
  • Basic proficiency in algebraic manipulation of equations
NEXT STEPS
  • Review the derivation of reflection and transmission coefficients in electromagnetic theory
  • Study the relationship between intensity and amplitude in wave physics
  • Examine the implications of the conservation of energy in wave interactions
  • Explore the differences between amplitude and intensity in the context of wave behavior
USEFUL FOR

Students and professionals in physics, particularly those specializing in optics and electromagnetic theory, as well as anyone involved in wave propagation analysis.

LCSphysicist
Messages
644
Reaction score
163
Homework Statement
.
Relevant Equations
.
I was supposed to find the relation among the coefficients $T$ and $R$ which represent the amplitude of the reflected electric field and the transmitted electric field respectively, that is, $$E_{R} = E_{i} R, E_{T} = E_{i} T$$ as well as the coefficients $t$ and $r$, that represent the fractional part of the intensity incident, that is, $$I_{R} = I_{i} r, I_{T} = I_{i} t$$

In fact, assuming that the first medium is the air/vacuum, I was able to deduce correctly the relations $$r = R^2, t = nT^2$$ where $n$ is the index of refraction of the second medium.

After doing so, I should be able to show that the sum of the intensities of the reflected and the transmitted wave is not equal to the intensity of the incident wave. The main problem is that I used exactly this to drive my relations! That is:

$$S_i = S_t + S_r \implies \frac{B_i E_i}{\mu_1} = \frac{B_t E_t}{\mu_2} + \frac{B_r E_r}{\mu_1}$$
$$B = E/v \implies \frac{1}{\mu_1} = \frac{R^2}{\mu_1} + \frac{T^2 c}{c/n \cdot \mu_2}$$
$$ \mu_{1} \approx \mu_{2} \implies 1 = R^2 + n T^2$$

where I now call $r = R^2, t = n T^2$

So I think you can see why I am confused. How am I supposed to prove the relations between $r$, $t$, $R$, $T$; and how do I prove that the intensities are in fact not equal?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Herculi said:
Homework Statement:: .
Relevant Equations:: .

I was supposed to find the relation among the coefficients $T$ and $R$ which represent the amplitude of the reflected electric field and the transmitted electric field respectively, that is, $$E_{R} = E_{i} R, E_{T} = E_{i} T$$ as well as the coefficients $t$ and $r$, that represent the fractional part of the intensity incident, that is, $$I_{R} = I_{i} r, I_{T} = I_{i} t$$

In fact, assuming that the first medium is the air/vacuum, I was able to deduce correctly the relations $$r = R^2, t = nT^2$$ where $n$ is the index of refraction of the second medium.

After doing so, I should be able to show that the sum of the intensities of the reflected and the transmitted wave is not equal to the intensity of the incident wave. The main problem is that I used exactly this to drive my relations! That is:

$$S_i = S_t + S_r \implies \frac{B_i E_i}{\mu_1} = \frac{B_t E_t}{\mu_2} + \frac{B_r E_r}{\mu_1}$$
$$B = E/v \implies \frac{1}{\mu_1} = \frac{R^2}{\mu_1} + \frac{T^2 c}{c/n \cdot \mu_2}$$
$$ \mu_{1} \approx \mu_{2} \implies 1 = R^2 + n T^2$$

where I now call $r = R^2, t = n T^2$

So I think you can see why I am confused. How am I supposed to prove the relations between $r$, $t$, $R$, $T$; and how do I prove that the intensities are in fact not equal?
According to (1232) onwards at https://farside.ph.utexas.edu/teaching/em/lectures/node104.html the reflected and transmitted intensities do add up to the incident.
The notation is a little different, using R, T where you have r, t.

Are you sure you are reading the question correctly?
 

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
758
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
911
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
8K
  • · Replies 16 ·
Replies
16
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K