Proving that the total mechanical energy is conserved with time

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving the conservation of total mechanical energy, expressed as ##E(t) = \frac{1}{2} mv^2 + V(x(t))##. Participants explore the derivative of total mechanical energy with respect to time, aiming to demonstrate that it equals zero. Key points include the relationship between force and potential energy, specifically ##F = -V'(x(t))##, and the application of the work-energy theorem, which states that the change in kinetic energy equals the negative change in potential energy. The conclusion affirms that total mechanical energy remains constant over time.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Newton's laws of motion
  • Familiarity with potential energy functions
  • Knowledge of derivatives in calculus
  • Basic concepts of kinetic energy and work-energy theorem
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the derivation of the work-energy theorem in classical mechanics
  • Explore the implications of conservative forces in mechanical systems
  • Learn about potential energy functions and their derivatives
  • Investigate the relationship between force, mass, and acceleration in various contexts
USEFUL FOR

Students of physics, educators teaching mechanics, and anyone interested in understanding the principles of energy conservation in mechanical systems.

Hamiltonian
Messages
296
Reaction score
193
Homework Statement
Prove that Total mechanical Energy is conserved with time.
Relevant Equations
-
proof of energy being conserved with t.png

To prove: total mechanical energy is constant with time
where ##E(t)## is the total mechanical energy and ##V(x(t))## is the potential energy of the object-system.
$$E(t) = 1/2 mv^2 + V(x(t))$$

taking the the derivative of ##E(t)## with respect time should give 0.
in the third step in the attached file i don't understand why ##-f(x(t)) = ma(t)##
also what is the significance of the function ##f(x(t))## which is equal to ##-V'(x(t))##

my attempt to a solution:
taking an example of a spring and block system(even though its not very general but I thought I'd get the idea).
so i defined ##E = 1/2mv^2 + 1/2kx^2##
from this i got ##E' = v(ma + kx)##
I could not further simplify this.

also I think I was able to prove the above using the work energy theorem ##\Delta KE = -\Delta PE ## hence ##\Delta(KE + PE) = 0##
so what am missing and doing wrong in the above method stated by me.:oldconfused:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
It's called Newton's law, usually written as ##F = ma##

In your example ## F = - kx## for a spring.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Steve4Physics
If you like, you can re-state their proof from a slightly different starting point; assuming the particle moves in some potential ##V(x)##, then$$m\ddot{x} = F_x = -V'(x)$$ $$m\ddot{x}\dot{x} = - V'(x) \dot{x}$$ $$\frac{d}{dt} \left(\frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 \right) = -\frac{d}{dt} V(x)$$ $$\frac{d}{dt} \left( \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + V(x) \right) = 0 \implies \frac{1}{2}m\dot{x}^2 + V(x) = E = \text{constant}$$
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: BvU, PeroK and Hamiltonian

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
893
  • · Replies 37 ·
2
Replies
37
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
982
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
4K
Replies
30
Views
2K