Proving the Commutation Relation for Quantized Boson in a One-Dimensional Box

  • Thread starter Thread starter Hill
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    quantized
Hill
Messages
735
Reaction score
575
Homework Statement
Show for a boson particle in a box of volume ##V## that $$\frac 1 V \sum_{\mathbf{pq}} e^{i(\mathbf{px}-\mathbf{qy})}[\hat a_{\mathbf p},\hat a^\dagger_{\mathbf q}]=\delta^{(3)}(\mathbf x - \mathbf y)$$
Relevant Equations
##[\hat a_{\mathbf p},\hat a^\dagger_{\mathbf q}]=\delta_{\mathbf{pq}}##
To simplify, I consider a one-dimensional box of the size L. I need to show in this case that
$$\frac 1 L \sum_{pq} e^{i(px-qy)}[\hat a_p,\hat a^\dagger_q]=\delta(x -y)$$
With the commutation relation above, it becomes
$$\frac 1 L \sum_p e^{ip(x-y)}=\delta(x -y)$$
p is quantized: ##p_m=\frac {2\pi m} L##

So I need to show that
$$\frac 1 L \sum_m e^{i \frac {2\pi m} L (x-y)}=\delta(x -y)$$
If ##x \neq y## the sum is ##0##, but I don't know how to proceed otherwise.
A hint?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Got it.

##\langle x|p \rangle= \frac 1 {\sqrt L} e^{ipx}##
and
##\langle p|y \rangle= \frac 1 {\sqrt L} e^{-ipy}##

OOH,
##\langle x|y \rangle = \delta(x-y)##

OTOH, inserting the resolution of identity,
##\langle x|y \rangle = \sum_p \langle x|p \rangle \langle p|y \rangle=\frac 1 L \sum_p e^{ip(x-y)}##

Thus,
##\frac 1 L \sum_p e^{ip(x-y)}=\delta(x-y)##
 
Last edited:
Thread 'Need help understanding this figure on energy levels'
This figure is from "Introduction to Quantum Mechanics" by Griffiths (3rd edition). It is available to download. It is from page 142. I am hoping the usual people on this site will give me a hand understanding what is going on in the figure. After the equation (4.50) it says "It is customary to introduce the principal quantum number, ##n##, which simply orders the allowed energies, starting with 1 for the ground state. (see the figure)" I still don't understand the figure :( Here is...
Thread 'Understanding how to "tack on" the time wiggle factor'
The last problem I posted on QM made it into advanced homework help, that is why I am putting it here. I am sorry for any hassle imposed on the moderators by myself. Part (a) is quite easy. We get $$\sigma_1 = 2\lambda, \mathbf{v}_1 = \begin{pmatrix} 0 \\ 0 \\ 1 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_2 = \lambda, \mathbf{v}_2 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} \sigma_3 = -\lambda, \mathbf{v}_3 = \begin{pmatrix} 1/\sqrt{2} \\ -1/\sqrt{2} \\ 0 \end{pmatrix} $$ There are two ways...
Back
Top