QFT Commutator for spacelike separation

Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
2 replies · 2K views
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Insights Author
Gold Member
2025 Award
Messages
29,810
Reaction score
21,639
Homework Statement
Show that the commutator for field operators is zero for spacelike separations
Relevant Equations
$$\hat \phi(x) = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3/2}(2E_p)^{1/2}}(\hat{a}_{\vec p}exp(-ip\cdot x)+\hat{a}^{\dagger}_{\vec p}exp(ip\cdot x))$$
I got as far as:
$$[\hat \phi(x), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(-ip.(x-y) - \exp(-ip.(y-x))$$
Then I simplified the problem by taking one of the four-vectors to be the origin:
$$[\hat \phi(0), \hat \phi(y) ] = \int \frac{d^3p}{(2\pi)^{3}(2E_p)}(\exp(ip.y) - \exp(-ip.y))$$
We need to show that this is zero for spacelike ##y##. But, I can't see how the spacelike condition is relevant. The hint in the book is that we can change ##-y## to ##y## in the second term. If ##p## was a three-vector I can see this, but the zeroth component of ##p## is the positive ##E_p##. And, if it's a simple ##p## substitution, then that should work for any ##y##, spacelike or otherwise.

Any help would be appreciated.
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: JD_PM
Physics news on Phys.org
I might have a solution. Assuming this whole theory is Lorentz invariant, then we could choose coordinates so that ##x## and ##y## are simultaneous. The zeroth term disappears from the inner product and the result follows.

I guess that's the trick.
 
Hint: You don't have to assume that the theory is Lorentz invariant, because the integral for sure is, because ##\mathrm{d}^3 p/E_p## is invariant, and ##y \cdot p## is too. That's why the integral is a scalar field operator. Now you can choose ##y## (given that it is space) in the most simple way to evaluate this function. Note that since you only have the four-vector ##y## available it's clear that the expression must be a function of ##y^2=y \cdot y## only!