Proving the Intersection of Subspaces is a Subspace: A Vector Space Proof

Click For Summary
To prove that the intersection of two subspaces H and K of a vector space V is itself a subspace, it is essential to demonstrate that this intersection is non-empty and closed under scalar multiplication and addition. The zero vector is present in both H and K, confirming that the intersection H ∩ K is non-empty. For any vectors x and y in H ∩ K, and scalars α and β, the linear combination αx + βy remains in both H and K, thus also in H ∩ K. This confirms that the intersection is closed under addition and scalar multiplication. Therefore, H ∩ K is a subspace of V.
Benny
Messages
577
Reaction score
0
Hi can someone please help me with the following question. Such questions always trouble me because I don't know where to start and/or cannot continue after starting.

Q. Let H and K be subspaces of a vector space V. Prove that the intersection of K and H is a subspace of V.

By the way that the question is set out I figure that all I need to show is that the intersection of K and H is non-empty, closed under scalar multiplication and addition. So here is what I've tried.

H and K are subspaces of the vector space V so they both contain the zero vector. So it follows that the intersection contains the zeor vector so that H \cap K \ne \emptyset.

That's all I can think of. I'm not sure if I can make any other assumptions about vectors which are common to H and K and so I cannot continue.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Now show that a lineair combination of vectors of H \cap K is still in H \cap K.
 
Thanks for your response but that's the sort of thing that I'm having trouble with. All I've been able to show is that the zero vector is in the intersection. I don't know which are vectors are in the intersection. I cannot figure out what else I extract from the stem of the question to assist me. It's probably just a conceptual thing but I can't really see what I can and can't use.
 
Well you already showed it's not empty. Now take the scalars \alpha ,\beta \in \mathbb{R} (or any other field of course) and the vectors \vec x,\vec y \in H \cap K[/tex]. Now, since the vectors are in both subspaces, we can say that:<br /> \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in H<br /> \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in K<br /> <br /> And thus: \alpha \vec x + \beta \vec y \in H \cap K
 
Ok thanks for the help.
 
The book claims the answer is that all the magnitudes are the same because "the gravitational force on the penguin is the same". I'm having trouble understanding this. I thought the buoyant force was equal to the weight of the fluid displaced. Weight depends on mass which depends on density. Therefore, due to the differing densities the buoyant force will be different in each case? Is this incorrect?

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
4K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
7K
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
3K