Proving the Inverse Existence of C and its Value through Matrix Proof

  • Thread starter Thread starter Rizzamabob
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Matrix Proof
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the existence of the inverse of a square matrix C under the condition that C^3 + C^2 + C + I = 0. Participants explore the implications of this equation and the properties of matrix multiplication.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss manipulating the original equation to express C in terms of its inverse and explore the validity of treating matrices similarly to variables. There are questions about the appropriateness of division in matrix algebra and the implications of matrix properties such as associativity and the existence of inverses.

Discussion Status

The conversation includes attempts to derive the inverse of C and clarifications on matrix operations. Some participants provide hints and alternative approaches, while others express concerns about the treatment of matrices in the context of division and variable manipulation. There is no explicit consensus on the final outcome, but productive dialogue is ongoing.

Contextual Notes

Participants note the importance of understanding matrix multiplication properties and the limitations of treating matrices as variables. The discussion is framed within the constraints of homework rules, emphasizing the need for careful reasoning in matrix algebra.

Rizzamabob
Messages
21
Reaction score
0
"Show that if a square matrix C satisfies
C^3 + C^2 + C + I = 0
then the inverse C^-1 exists and
C^-1 = -(C^2 + C + I)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
hint

all you need to remember is that
c^(-1)c=I
and
c^2 = cc
c^3 = ccc
and the associative property of matrix multiplication
P.S. c^(-1) is taken here as the left inverse of c
 
Ok, i didn't realize i could write matrix's like that and deal with them just as variables...
OK so this is what i did...

CCC + CC + C + I = 0 (re arrange)
C = - (CCC + CC + I) (I = C^(1) C)
C = - (CCC + CC + (C^(-1)C)) (GET C^(-1)C on other side)
C^(-1)C = - (CCC + CC + C) (DIVIDE BY C)
C^(-1) = - (CC + C + 1) (1 = Identity matrix)
C^(-1) = - (CC + C + I)

DONE !? :!) :rolleyes:
 
you are okay up to your third equation

"Show that if a square matrix C satisfies
C^3 + C^2 + C + I = 0
then the inverse C^-1 exists and
C^-1 = -(C^2 + C + I)

Lets do it simpler...

Just multiple your left hand side (every term on it !) by C^(-1) and the right hand side by the same.

C^(-1) ( C^3 + C^2+ C +I) = C^(-1) 0

What do you get from here is the result that you're looking for
 
Because well, you cannot exactly treat matrices as variables..

The Division (Divide by C) is not defined, just the multiplication.
and the multiplication of a matrix by its (left) inverse has the property that

C^(-1)C=I

And because the matrix multiplication is associative, if

C^2=CC then C^(-1)C^2= C^(-1)CC = (C^(-1) C) C = I C = C

something similar for C^3 or an arbitrary power of C
 

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 25 ·
Replies
25
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K