Proving the lim as n goes to infinity of a function = 2

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Rubik
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Function Infinity
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The limit of the function as n approaches infinity is proven to be 2 using the epsilon-N definition of limits. Specifically, for the function f(n) = 2n/(n-1), it is established that for any ε > 0, there exists an N such that if n > N, then |f(n) - 2| < ε. The proof involves manipulating the inequality to find N > 1 + 2/ε, demonstrating the relationship between n and ε through a series of invertible steps, commonly referred to as a "synthetic proof."

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of limits in calculus
  • Familiarity with the epsilon-N definition of limits
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
  • Knowledge of synthetic proof techniques
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the epsilon-N definition of limits in more detail
  • Practice proving limits for various functions using the synthetic proof method
  • Explore examples of limits involving rational functions
  • Learn about convergence and divergence of sequences
USEFUL FOR

Students of calculus, mathematics educators, and anyone looking to deepen their understanding of limit proofs and epsilon-N arguments.

Rubik
Messages
95
Reaction score
0
I am unsure as to how to prove a that as the limit as n goes to inifinity of a certain function the answer is 2.. I am trying to use the definition of a limit and using [tex]\epsilon[/tex] and N - argument to get a contradiction in order to solve the equation.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As long as I do not know the specific function, the only thing I can say is "use the definition".

To prove that [itex]\lim_{n\to\infty} f(n)= 2[/itex], show that, given any [itex]\epsilon> 0[/itex], there exist a number, N, such that if n>N, then [itex]|f(n)- 2|< \epsilon[/itex].

Again, exactly how you show that that is true depends upon the particular function. For example, if the function were
[tex]f(n)= \frac{2n}{n- 1}[/tex]
Then I would need to make
[tex]\left|\frac{2n}{n-1}- 2\right|= \left|2-\frac{2}{n-1}- 2\right|= \left|\frac{2}{n-1}\right|< \epsilon[/tex]

For n> 1, that is the same as
[tex]n- 1> \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex]
or
[tex]n> 1+ \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex].

Now, for any given finite number, [itex]\epsilon[/itex], I can certainly choose a specific N and use that. Strictly speaking the proof would go the other way: Having chosen
[tex]N> 1+ \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex]
if n> N, then
[tex]n> 1+ \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex]
so that
[tex]n- 1> \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{1}{n-1}< \frac{\epsilon}{2}[/tex]
[tex]\frac{2}{n-1}< \epsilon[/tex]
etc.

Because each step in working from
[tex]\left|\frac{2n}{n-1}- 2\right|< \epsilon[/tex]
to
[tex]n> 1+ \frac{2}{\epsilon}[/tex]
was invertible we can "work backwards" and so that is not typically shown. This is often referred to as "synthetic proof".
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
10K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
9K