Proving the Limit of f(x)-g(x) for Even Integer Polynomials

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving the limit of the difference between two polynomials, f(x) and g(x), where both have even integer degrees and g(x) has a higher degree than f(x). The original poster seeks to establish that the limit as x approaches negative infinity of f(x) - g(x) equals negative infinity.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking, Conceptual clarification

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the structure of the polynomials and the implications of their degrees. The original poster attempts to express the polynomials in standard form and analyze the limit behavior as x approaches negative infinity. Some participants question the assumptions regarding the coefficients and the implications of the polynomial degrees on the limit.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on the original poster's attempts and suggesting clarifications. There is a recognition of the need for a more rigorous approach, and some participants offer insights into polynomial behavior at negative infinity, while others explore the conditions under which the original claim might hold.

Contextual Notes

There are assumptions about the coefficients of the polynomials being positive and the degrees being even integers. The original poster acknowledges the lack of rigor in their proof and seeks guidance on improving it.

madah12
Messages
326
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


I want to prove that a polynomial f(x) and a polynomial g(x) with degrees of k,n where k,n are positive even integer, n>k
that limit x-> - infinity of f(x)-g(x)=-infinity



Homework Equations


a polynomial can be written as
a1x^n+a2x^(n-1)...+a(n-1)x+an


The Attempt at a Solution


Since n>k and k,n are positive even integers there is a positive even integer C such that
n=(k+C)
therefore we write f(x)=a1x^k+a2x^(k-1)+...+a(k-1)x+ak/b1x^(c+k)
g(x)=b1x^(k+C)+b2x^(k+C)-1+...+b(k+c-1)x+b(k+c)
f(x)-g(x)=[a1x^k+a2x^(k-1)+...+a(k-1)x+ak]-[b1x^(k+C)+b2x^((k+C)-1)+...+b(k+c-1)x+b(k+c)]
=b1x^(k+c)[[a1/(b1*x^c) + a2/(b1*x^(-c-1)) ...a(k-1)/b1x^(c+k-1) + ak/b1x^(c+k)] -[ 1+b2/b1x +...+b(c+k-1)/b1x^(k+c-1)+bc+k/b1x^(c+k)]]
as x->-infinity
c/x^n = 0 THEOREM
therefore
since k+c is even then lim x->-infinity x^(c+K)=infinity
so limit x->-infinity f(x)-g(x)
=infinity *[(0+0+...+0+0)-(1+0...+0+0)=infinity * -1 = -infinity.
I know this isn't any kind of rigorous proof so how can I improve it?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
would this also qualify as proof for limit x->-infinity of g(x)-f(x) = infinity?
 
any help?
 
It's not true, in general. The behavior of a polynomial depends on both its degree and the sign of the highest degree coefficient.

For example,
[tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} 3x^2 = +\infty[/tex]

but
[tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} -2x^2 = -\infty[/tex]

For the theorem you are trying to prove, g(x) is of higher degree than f(x), so g(x) is going to dominate f(x) in the difference f(x) - g(x), when x is very large or very negative.

Here are a couple of specific examples:
[tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} x^2 - 2x^4= -\infty[/tex]

[tex]\lim_{x \to -\infty} x^2 - (-3x^4 + x^3)= +\infty[/tex]
 
but it is true if I assume both a1 and b1 to be positive?
Also I am assuming both polynomials have positive even degrees
so I am safe from the argument that 0 is a polynomial.
 
madah12 said:

Homework Statement


I want to prove that a polynomial f(x) and a polynomial g(x) with degrees of k,n where k,n are positive even integer, n>k
that limit x-> - infinity of f(x)-g(x)=-infinity



Homework Equations


a polynomial can be written as
a1x^n+a2x^(n-1)...+a(n-1)x+an


The Attempt at a Solution


Since n>k and k,n are positive even integers there is a positive even integer C such that
n=(k+C)
therefore we write f(x)=a1x^k+a2x^(k-1)+...+a(k-1)x+ak/b1x^(c+k)
What do you mean "therefore"? You should first define f(x) and g(x). A nicer way to do things is to have the indexes of the coefficients match the exponents on the variables. For example, you could define f(x) as
f(x) = akxk + ak-1xk-1 + ... + a1x + a0, with a similar definition for g(x).

Why do you have this term at the end? ak/b1x^(c+k)

madah12 said:
g(x)=b1x^(k+C)+b2x^(k+C)-1+...+b(k+c-1)x+b(k+c)
f(x)-g(x)=[a1x^k+a2x^(k-1)+...+a(k-1)x+ak]-[b1x^(k+C)+b2x^((k+C)-1)+...+b(k+c-1)x+b(k+c)]
=b1x^(k+c)[[a1/(b1*x^c) + a2/(b1*x^(-c-1)) ...a(k-1)/b1x^(c+k-1) + ak/b1x^(c+k)] -[ 1+b2/b1x +...+b(c+k-1)/b1x^(k+c-1)+bc+k/b1x^(c+k)]]
as x->-infinity
c/x^n = 0 THEOREM
therefore
since k+c is even then lim x->-infinity x^(c+K)=infinity
so limit x->-infinity f(x)-g(x)
=infinity *[(0+0+...+0+0)-(1+0...+0+0)=infinity * -1 = -infinity.
I know this isn't any kind of rigorous proof so how can I improve it?
 
uhm actually because when I was making the post I mistaken that line with the next I didn't notice this ak/b1x^(c+k)
Also about the therefore I meant that the general form of a polynomial is that of what I wrote.
Why would it matter if I started at a0or started at ac+k?
 
Start by defining f(x) and g(x). You can index the coefficients either way, but it makes it easier to follow if the coefficient index matches the exponent.
 
ok then f(x) ,g(x) are polynomials
f(x)=akx^k+ak-1x^(k-1)+...+a1x+a0
g(x)=b(c+k)x^(c+k) +b(c+k)-1x^(c+k-1)+...+b1x+b0
 
  • #10
Then f(x) - g(x) = akx^k+ak-1x^(k-1)+...+a1x+a0 - (b(c+k)x^(c+k) +b(c+k)-1x^(c+k-1)+...+b1x+b0)

You can factor xk out of all terms and then take your limit.
 
  • #11
shouldnt I factor bc+kx^(c+k)?
so I get bc+kx^(c+k) [(0-0-...-00-0)-(1-0-0-0)
=infinity (-1)=-infinity?
because everything else will have an x in the denominator and as x-> infinity all will go to 0.
 
  • #12
OK, yes, you could do that.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K