Proving the Metric Property of d(x,y)=|x3-y3) for a Given Function

Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving that the function d(x,y)=|x³-y³| satisfies the properties of a metric. The primary challenge is to demonstrate the triangle inequality, d(x,y) ≤ d(x,z) + d(z,y). Participants agree that while considering cases such as x < y < z is one approach, a more straightforward method involves applying the existing triangle inequality for the standard metric on the reals, |x-y| ≤ |x-z| + |z-y|, by substituting each variable with its cube.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of metric spaces and their properties
  • Familiarity with the triangle inequality in real analysis
  • Knowledge of cubic functions and their behavior
  • Basic algebraic manipulation skills
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of metric spaces in detail
  • Learn about the triangle inequality in various contexts, including real analysis
  • Explore the implications of cubic functions in metric properties
  • Practice proving metrics with different functions beyond d(x,y)=|x³-y³|
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding metric spaces and their properties, particularly in the context of real analysis and function behavior.

mynameisfunk
Messages
122
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



prove that the given function is a metric, or give a counterexample to show how it fails to be a metric: d(x,y)=|x3-y3|

Homework Equations



ok, out of the 3 requirements to be a metric, 2 are trivial. The third is to prove the triangle inequality holds: d(x,y)\leqd(x,z)+d(z,y)

should i just go through the different cases of x<y<z , x<z<y , z<x<y?? and if the inequality holds true for all of them I am done? I feel like there must be a better way to take care of this... Oh, and please don't spoil the question for me. Thanks
 
Physics news on Phys.org
As you have written the inequality to prove, you may assume x \leq y since otherwise you can just switch the positions of the two variables. You still have to consider further cases but this should simplify the problem slightly.
 
since i already have that |x-y|\leq|x-z|+|z-y| is a metric space, there must be a real direct way to show this holds true also right?
 
Yes, well precisely that is the triangle inequality for the usual metric on the reals. You're still working with the usual metric on R, so try to use the same triangle inequality you just wrote, except with each variable replaced by its cube.
 
I don't see another case other than the 3 in my first post assuming that x\leqy
 
mynameisfunk said:
I don't see another case other than the 3 in my first post assuming that x\leqy

There's no cases necessary. snipez90 already told you how to do it directly. This is a LOT easier than you think it is.
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
9
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 0 ·
Replies
0
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K