Proving the Oddity of n^2+n+1 Directly from Definition

  • Thread starter Thread starter kuahji
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Definition
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around proving that the expression n^2+n+1 is odd for all integers n, specifically focusing on a direct proof from the definitions of the terms involved, without relying on previously established facts about parity or properties of even and odd numbers.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants explore the implications of defining n as either even or odd and question whether using known properties of parity constitutes relying on previously known facts. There is a discussion on how to approach the proof without invoking established rules about even and odd numbers.

Discussion Status

Some participants have attempted to break down the problem by cases based on the parity of n, while others express confusion about the requirements for a direct proof. There is a recognition that the professor's intent regarding the definition of terms is crucial, but participants are unsure how to proceed without using established parity concepts.

Contextual Notes

There is a concern about needing to prove the definitions of even and odd numbers or the nature of consecutive integers as part of the proof, which may complicate the approach to the problem.

kuahji
Messages
390
Reaction score
2
For all integers n; n^2+n+1 is odd.

Prove the statement directly from definition of the terms & do not use any previously known facts.

My main problem is if n^2+n+1=n(n+1)+1 then can I say n is even & n+1 is odd or would that imply that I'm using previously known facts. In the text there is a section on parity, but I'd hate to have to have a proof inside of a proof. Then even worse, would I then have to go through & prove what even & odd are? Not really sure what "directly from the definition of the terms" implies. Any ideas? Its obvious the professor would know best what she meant but there is no way to contact her atm.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Well what they DON'T want you to do is say "well if n is odd then n^2 is odd, odd number plus an even number(the odd number n and then +1 is even)is always an odd number

if n is even then n^2 is even, even + odd = odd again(n+1 would be odd in the case of even n) That's what they DON'T want to see

You knew before hand as a fact that even * even = even, odd * odd = odd, and even+odd=odd. You would have to prove THOSE if you wanted to use 'em. And you could!
 
Obviously n is either even or odd right? In each case what is the parity of n(n+1), and hence what is the parity of n^2+n+1?
 
blochwave said:
You knew before hand as a fact that even * even = even, odd * odd = odd, and even+odd=odd. You would have to prove THOSE if you wanted to use 'em. And you could!

What I did was break it down by cases. But first I said consecutive integers must be even & odd or odd & even, by parity. Then Case 1 was n is odd & hence n+1 is even. Case two n is even & n+1 two is odd (these were drawn out showing the algebraic steps). Then I showed how an odd times an even always equaled an even, 2(integer). But I just got a big x on my paper that said refer to directions, not proven directly from definition of terms & the word parity was underlined.

So does that mean I would have to prove consecutive integers are even/odd since I set it up to n(n+1)+1? Sorry for the confusion, as I'm a bit confused as well.
 
Or, to be very precise:

n is either even or odd.

case 1: If n is even, n= 2m for some integer m. Then n2+ n+ 1= (2m)2+(2m)+ 1= 4m2+ 2m+ 1= 2(2m2+ m)+ 1, an odd number.

case 2: If n is odd, n= 2m+1 for some integer m. Then n2+ n+ 1= (2m+1)2+ (2m+1)+ 1= 4m2+ 2m+ 1+ 2m+ 1+ 1= 4m2+ 4m+ 3= 2(2m2+ 2m+ 1)+ 1, again an odd number.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
7K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K