Proving the Primality of a Natural Number with Divisibility Property

  • Thread starter Thread starter ar6
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Prime Proof
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a natural number q is prime if it satisfies the condition that q divides a or q divides b whenever q divides ab, with q being greater than 1. Participants suggest using the contrapositive approach for the proof, indicating that if q is not prime, there exist natural numbers a and b such that q divides ab but does not divide either a or b. The conversation emphasizes the importance of unique prime factorization in constructing the proof, particularly when considering composite numbers.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of prime and composite numbers
  • Familiarity with divisibility properties
  • Knowledge of contrapositive reasoning in proofs
  • Basic concepts of unique prime factorization
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of prime numbers and their definitions
  • Learn about divisibility rules and their applications in proofs
  • Explore contrapositive reasoning in mathematical logic
  • Investigate unique prime factorization and its significance in number theory
USEFUL FOR

This discussion is beneficial for students in introductory advanced mathematics courses, particularly those studying number theory and proof techniques. It is also useful for educators seeking to guide students through foundational concepts in mathematical proofs.

ar6
Messages
5
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement


I'm starting an introductory course in "Advanced math" and need a little homework guidance please.

The question: Let a, b, and q be natural numbers, and q > 1. Prove that if q has the property: q divides a or q divides b whenever q divides ab, then q is prime.




Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution



Ok. First I'm assuming that this proof can't be too hard especially for one of the first assignments and is probably a standard one to assign new students in this subject so I apologize if this has been asked before. A little nudge in the right direction would be helpful. I think that I should try to prove the contrapositive. So assume q is not prime but then I am a little confused on what exactly ~(p) would be. Any help would be appreciated
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Since a and b are both composite, let ab= mnjk, where two factors of mnjk is a and the other two is b. If p is prime and it divides ab = mnjk, then taking any combination of two of m,n,j, or k to be one factor and two to be the other, it is evident that one of the two factors must be divisible by p. Now prove the converse.
 
I like your contrapositive idea. The contrapositive is that if q is NOT prime, then there is an a and b such that q divides ab but q does not divide a or b. If q is NOT prime, i.e. composite, what's a good choice for a and b? bel, the OP doesn't have to prove the converse. That's harder and requires unique prime factorization.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
20
Views
4K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K