Proving the superposition principle

Click For Summary
The discussion focuses on proving the superposition principle for linear homogeneous equations, specifically for the equation y' + p(t)y = 0. A user initially struggles with how to demonstrate that the sum of two solutions, u(t) + w(t), is also a solution. They realize that by substituting the derivatives of u(t) and w(t) into the original ODE, they can confirm that the sum is indeed a solution. The conversation then shifts to proving that a constant multiple of a solution, ku(t), is also a solution, and ultimately extends to showing that any linear combination of solutions, au(t) + bv(t), is valid as long as u(t) and v(t) are solutions. The thread concludes with a successful understanding of the superposition principle in this context.
bleucat
Messages
4
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Hi everyone.
I am trying to prove the superposition principle for linear homogeneous equations, which states that if u(t) and w(t) are solutions to y' + p(t)y = 0, then u(t) + w(t) and k(u(t)) are also solutions for any constant k.


The Attempt at a Solution


I substituted (u + w) in for y, but how does that help me?

Thanks in advance for the help!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Use the fact that u(t),w(t) satisfy the ODE.
 
As in, what differentiation property makes u + w a solution if u, w are?
 
The statement u(t),w(t): solutions of the ODE means

u'(t)+p(t)\,u(t)=0, \, w'(t)+p(t)\,w(t)=0

Put y'(t)=u'(t)+w'(t) in the original ODE and use the above equations.
 
Hah, I got it. That wasn't bad at all.
Thanks!
 
Now, can you do it for ku(t)? And, can you prove that those two together show that
au(t)+ bv(t) is a solution for any numbers a, b, as long as u(t) and v(t) are solutions?
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
6K