Proving three vectors are coplanar

  • Thread starter Thread starter FaraDazed
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Vectors
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The vectors a=(3,2,-1), b=(5,-7,3), and c=(11,-3,1) are proven to be coplanar through the determinant method. The determinant of the matrix formed by these vectors as column vectors is calculated to be zero, indicating that the vectors are not linearly independent. This confirms their coplanarity, as one vector can be expressed as a linear combination of the others. The discussion emphasizes the importance of understanding the underlying concepts rather than solely relying on formulas.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector operations and properties
  • Knowledge of determinants and their significance in linear algebra
  • Familiarity with linear combinations of vectors
  • Basic grasp of coplanarity in three-dimensional space
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of determinants in linear algebra
  • Learn how to express vectors as linear combinations
  • Explore the geometric interpretation of coplanarity
  • Investigate the relationship between linear independence and vector spaces
USEFUL FOR

Students in mathematics or physics, particularly those studying linear algebra, vector calculus, or anyone needing to understand the concept of coplanarity in three-dimensional space.

FaraDazed
Messages
347
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Prove that the vectors a=(3,2,-1), b=(5,-7,3), c=(11, -3, 1) are coplanar.

Homework Equations


not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


First time I have ever came across the term coplanar, I know what it means but did not know any tests for it. So I did a little research and found that one way is to test if they are linearly independent and that if that are not linearly independent then that means they must be coplanar.

So where I found this out, it had a few example of testing for linearly independency using the determent of a matrix formed by the three vectors (as column vectors) and I think I have done it correct as my answer comes out to zero. But as I am extremely new to this (the past half hour or so) I wanted a second opinion.
<br /> Det \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 3 &amp; 5 &amp; 11 \\<br /> 2 &amp; -7 &amp; 3 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 3 &amp; 1<br /> \end{vmatrix}<br /> =3(-7+9)-5(2-3)+11(6-7) = 6+5+(-11)=0<br />

And therefore as the determent is zero, that means they are NOT linearly independent, and hence means that they are coplanar. At least this is what I have gathered from a little bit of research.

Appreciate it if someone could double check the thinking behind the method. Thanks :)
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Oops, I meant independent not dependendent, so I have gone back and corrected that. Plus added in the matrix, (thanks Simon for the link) .

Thanks for the link to the other thread too, I did come across it before but did not read all of it.
 
you have to show that one vector is a scalar multiple of the other and that they share a common point. xx
 
FaraDazed said:

Homework Statement


Prove that the vectors a=(3,2,-1), b=(5,-7,3), c=(11, -3, 1) are coplanar.

Homework Equations


not sure

The Attempt at a Solution


First time I have ever came across the term coplanar, I know what it means but did not know any tests for it. So I did a little research and found that one way is to test if they are linearly independent and that if that are not linearly independent then that means they must be coplanar.

So where I found this out, it had a few example of testing for linearly independency using the determent of a matrix formed by the three vectors (as column vectors) and I think I have done it correct as my answer comes out to zero. But as I am extremely new to this (the past half hour or so) I wanted a second opinion.
<br /> Det \begin{vmatrix}<br /> 3 &amp; 5 &amp; 11 \\<br /> 2 &amp; -7 &amp; 3 \\<br /> -1 &amp; 3 &amp; 1<br /> \end{vmatrix}<br /> =3(-7+9)-5(2-3)+11(6-7) = 6+5+(-11)=0<br />

And therefore as the determent is zero, that means they are NOT linearly independent, and hence means that they are coplanar. At least this is what I have gathered from a little bit of research.

Appreciate it if someone could double check the thinking behind the method. Thanks :)

Yes, your reasoning is OK. However, it would be better if you really understood what is happening, rather than just plugging in formulas you do not fully grasp. The point is that if the three vectors are coplanar, then (unless they all point along a single line), one of them will be a linear combination of the other two. In other words, there should be numbers r and s giving ##\vec{c} = r \vec{a} + s \vec{b}##. In detail, these say
3 r + 5 s = 11\\<br /> 2r - 7 s = 3\\<br /> -r + 3s = 1<br />
You can solve for r and s from the first two equations, then see if the resulting solution also satisfies the third equation; if it does, you are done, as you will have found a way to express ##\vec{c}## as a linear combination of ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}##.
 
Ray Vickson said:
Yes, your reasoning is OK. However, it would be better if you really understood what is happening, rather than just plugging in formulas you do not fully grasp. The point is that if the three vectors are coplanar, then (unless they all point along a single line), one of them will be a linear combination of the other two. In other words, there should be numbers r and s giving ##\vec{c} = r \vec{a} + s \vec{b}##. In detail, these say
3 r + 5 s = 11\\<br /> 2r - 7 s = 3\\<br /> -r + 3s = 1<br />
You can solve for r and s from the first two equations, then see if the resulting solution also satisfies the third equation; if it does, you are done, as you will have found a way to express ##\vec{c}## as a linear combination of ##\vec{a}## and ##\vec{b}##.

Thank you, that has helped a lot :) . I agree about having to have a good understanding of what is happening, everything makes much more sense when it is understood what's going on. Like in this situation however, I had to hand in the coursework the following day so just knowing if the method and answer was correct was all I needed first, then I can get to grips with what's actually going on afterwards, like now :)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
10
Views
3K