Proving Vector Addition on a Triangle

Click For Summary
The discussion revolves around proving vector addition in a triangle, specifically the relationship involving midpoints. The original poster struggled with the proof and sought assistance, leading to a breakdown of vector relationships using the parallelogram law. After collaboration with peers, they determined the height of the triangle and calculated coordinates for points A, B, and C. The final result showed that the sum of the vectors OA, OB, and OC equated to zero, confirming the proof. The poster expressed satisfaction in resolving the problem before class.
dtmcnamara
Messages
3
Reaction score
0
Hey guys. Long time lurker, first time poster.

My teacher gave us this little problem a while ago to work on kind of as a brain teaser. He wanted the proof. I have never been too good a proofs so I never did it. I was going through my notebook and decided to see if you guys could help me, or point me in the right direction.

Like I said, all we needed to do was provide the proof, thanks

untitled-1.jpg
 
Physics news on Phys.org
The problem doesn't make a whole lot of sense to me. Did you copy the problem correctly?

With vectors they often want you to prove a relationship like AB + AC = 2AD or something like that.

In that case, seeing as how “D” is the midpoint of BC, by parallelogram law you have:

\vec{AD} + \vec{DB} = \vec{AB} ...(1)

\vec{AD} + \vec{DC} = \vec{AC} ...(2)

Also \vec{BD} = \frac{1}{2} \vec{BC} = \vec{DC} ...(3)

Adding (I) & (II) gives;

\vec{AC} + \vec{AB} = \vec{AD} + \vec{DB} + \vec{AD} + \vec{DC} (by (3))

= 2 \vec{AD} (as \vec{DB} + \vec{BD} = 0)
 
We are going over it tomorrow in class. Its just nice to actually know the answer before he goes over it so then you can truly understand everything.

Just in case its not clear the last part is a 0 ZERO not a O.

I think your going on the right track. He said its VERY simple once you see it. I have searched google and have found nothing yet.

I will post the answer tomorrow after class (9:45pm EST) if its not figured out.

THANKS
 
Ok so here we go. I got it finished today thanks to a little help from some friends in the math lab at my school.

What I needed to do was first find the height of the triangle.

I set the sides to a and then found the height using a^2+b^2=c^2

Then I used the known information that the center point is 2/3 of the way down from a point, and 1/3 from the bottom. Using this I could find the exact height of each section.

Then I needed to find the length from O to C which would also be the same length from O to B and O to A. I also use the a^2+b^2=c^2 to find this.

After that I put the origin at the center and figured out the coordinates for A, B and C.

Once that was done I made the OA, OB, OC vectors. Then I just merely added the i's and j's together and came out with 0i + 0j.

Hers is the work scanned into the computer.

calc3.jpg
 
Question: A clock's minute hand has length 4 and its hour hand has length 3. What is the distance between the tips at the moment when it is increasing most rapidly?(Putnam Exam Question) Answer: Making assumption that both the hands moves at constant angular velocities, the answer is ## \sqrt{7} .## But don't you think this assumption is somewhat doubtful and wrong?

Similar threads

  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
9K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
7
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
2K