MHB Proving Vector Subspace $U \notin R^3$

  • Thread starter Thread starter bbelson01
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces Vector
Click For Summary
The discussion centers on proving that the set U = {(x,y,z) | x is an integer} is not a subspace of R^3. Participants recognize that to establish U as a subspace, it must be shown to be closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication. The key issue arises with scalar multiplication; if c is a real number and (x,y,z) is in U, then cx must also be an integer for (cx, cy, cz) to belong to U, which is not guaranteed. This demonstrates that U fails to meet the criteria for being a subspace of R^3. The conclusion is that U is not a subspace due to the failure of closure under scalar multiplication.
bbelson01
Messages
6
Reaction score
0
Hi All,

How do I prove that $U=\{(x,y,z)|x \mbox{ is an integer}\}$ is not a subspace of $R^3$?

I understand that I have to show $U$ is closed or not closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication but I'm unsure how I represent $x$ as an integer.

I would say:
let $V=\{v=(x,y,z) \in R^3\}$ a set of vectors in $R^3$.

$v_1 = (x_1, y_1, z_1)$ and $v_2=(x_2, y_2, z_2)$ then $v_1 + v_2=(x_1+x_2, y_1+y_2, z_1+z_2)$ a vector in $U$. $U$ is closed under vector addition.

Now let $c$ be an element of the set of real numbers. Then $cv=c(x,y,z) =(cx, cy, cz)$ which is an element of $U$. So $U$ is closed under scalar multiplication.

This is clearly not right as the question says to show it is NOT a subspace. Where am I going wrong?

Thanks
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
bbelson01 said:
Hi All,

How do I prove that U={(x,y,z)|x is an integer} is not a subspace of R^3?

I understand that I have to show U is closed or not closed under vector addition and scalar multiplication but I'm unsure how I represent x as an integer.

I would say:
let V={v=(x,y,z) \epsilon R^3} a set of vectors in R^3.

v1 = (x1, y1, z1) and v2=(x2, y2, z2) then v1 + v2=(x1+x2, y1+y2, z1+z2) a vector in U. U is closed under vector addition.

Now let c be an element of the set of real numbers. Then cv=c(x,y,z) =(cx, cy, cz) which is an element of U. So U is closed under scalar multiplication.

This is clearly not right as the question says to show it is NOT a subspace. Where am I going wrong?

Thanks
Think more carefully about the paragraph in red. For (cx,cy,cz) to be an element of U, its first coordinate cx must be an integer. Does that have to be the case?
 
Thank you for your response. That was pretty obvious wasn't it? Ooops.
 
Thread 'How to define a vector field?'
Hello! In one book I saw that function ##V## of 3 variables ##V_x, V_y, V_z## (vector field in 3D) can be decomposed in a Taylor series without higher-order terms (partial derivative of second power and higher) at point ##(0,0,0)## such way: I think so: higher-order terms can be neglected because partial derivative of second power and higher are equal to 0. Is this true? And how to define vector field correctly for this case? (In the book I found nothing and my attempt was wrong...

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K