Proving Vector Subspace: V in W iff V+W in W

  • Context: Undergrad 
  • Thread starter Thread starter Juggler123
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Subspaces Vector
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on proving that a vector space V is in a subspace W if and only if the sum of any vector v in V and a vector w in W is also in W. The proof requires demonstrating both directions of the "if and only if" statement, leveraging the closure property of subspaces. Specifically, if w is in W and v is not in W, then w + v cannot be in W, confirming that v must also be in W for the sum to remain in W. This approach utilizes the contrapositive method: A implies B, and not B implies not A.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of vector spaces and subspaces
  • Familiarity with the closure properties of vector spaces
  • Knowledge of proof techniques, particularly contrapositive proofs
  • Basic concepts of finite dimensionality in linear algebra
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of vector spaces and subspaces in linear algebra
  • Learn about the closure properties and their implications in vector spaces
  • Explore contrapositive proof techniques in mathematical logic
  • Investigate finite dimensional vector spaces and their characteristics
USEFUL FOR

Students of linear algebra, mathematicians, and anyone interested in understanding the foundational concepts of vector spaces and subspace proofs.

Juggler123
Messages
80
Reaction score
0
I have been given that V is a finite dimensional vector space over a field F and that W is a subspace of V. I need to show that v is an element of W if and only if v+w is an element of W.

I know that because it is an 'if and only if' proof it needs to proved in both directions but don't really know where else to go from there! Any help would be great, thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I am going to assume that w is given to be in W.

You could show that

If W is a subspace of V then
let w E W be a vector in W. (non empty)
let v E V be a vector in V. (non empty)

if w+v is NOT in W then v is NOT in W due to closure condition. if v is in W then v+w MUST be in W and V.

so you have shown that w+v either is or is not in W and if it is in W then
it must also be in V and if w+v is in W then both w and v must be in W. (closure)

Even If I worded it incorrectly I am sure that this involves closure condition for subspace.
 
notice i used this method

A ==> B, not B ==> not A
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
3K
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
3K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
5K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K