Proving W is Real-Valued: Equation and Solution

  • Thread starter Thread starter pivoxa15
  • Start date Start date
Join the discussion
Registration is free. Ask a follow-up in this thread, or start your own.
7 replies · 2K views
pivoxa15
Messages
2,250
Reaction score
1

Homework Statement


The question is in the post below.

Show the equation W posted is real valued.

The Attempt at a Solution


The idea is to show that W conjugate = W but there is a complex exponential in W which makes things tricky?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Okay. I have put the equation up in the document. Show W is real valued.
 

Attachments

  • W is real valued.GIF
    W is real valued.GIF
    5 KB · Views: 535
Is it because psi conjugated produces a negative in the y value so y has only an imaginary component. mod spi sqaured is real. since y has a factor or i, it will cancel with the i already apparent in the exponential. So everything in the integral is positive hence W is positive.
 
Yes. The imaginary part of the integrand is an odd function ([itex]e^{iy}= cos(y)+ i sin(y)[/itex] and sin is odd) so its integral over a region symmetric about 0 ([itex]-\infty[/itex] to [itex]\infty[/itex] is 0.
 
That is very neat. But is my long explanation also correct? Although in my explantion, I said that y is purely imaginary. Is that correct would sin(y) make sense then?

In that integral y is claimed to be the integration variable but how does that make sense? Why do you need an integration variable? why not integrate wrt p or x?

This means y can't be complex valued which raises the question why are the arguments in psi have plus and minus y/2 for non conjugate and conjugate psi.
 
Last edited:
pivoxa15 said:
That is very neat. But is my long explanation also correct? Although in my explantion, I said that y is purely imaginary. Is that correct would sin(y) make sense then?

In that integral y is claimed to be the integration variable but how does that make sense? Why do you need an integration variable? why not integrate wrt p or x?

This means y can't be complex valued which raises the question why are the arguments in psi have plus and minus y/2 for non conjugate and conjugate psi.

[itex]y[/itex] is a dummy variable. Imagine if you had a function:

[tex]f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^x 1[/tex]

The integral is no different, [itex]y[/itex] is used to "increment" (so to speak), just as [itex]n[/itex] is.
 
FrogPad said:
[itex]y[/itex] is a dummy variable. Imagine if you had a function:

[tex]f(x) = \sum_{n=1}^x 1[/tex]

The integral is no different, [itex]y[/itex] is used to "increment" (so to speak), just as [itex]n[/itex] is.

Right, W is a function of x and p and the integral has nothing to do with x or p, it is there to evaluate a number with constants x and p.