Proving (x^2)>0: A Simple Guide

  • Thread starter Thread starter cacosomoza
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on proving the inequality (x^2) > 0 for real numbers x. It is established that the statement holds true for all x except when x equals zero, where the correct expression is (x^2) ≥ 0. Participants suggest using properties of ordered fields to demonstrate that a positive real number multiplied by itself yields a positive result, and similarly for negative numbers. The conversation also touches on the limitations of using induction for this proof since x belongs to the set of real numbers (R) rather than natural numbers (N).

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of real numbers and their properties
  • Familiarity with inequalities and their proofs
  • Basic knowledge of ordered fields
  • Concept of mathematical induction
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of ordered fields in detail
  • Learn how to prove inequalities involving real numbers
  • Explore the concept of minima for functions in calculus
  • Review mathematical induction and its applications in proofs
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in understanding proofs related to inequalities and properties of real numbers.

cacosomoza
Messages
11
Reaction score
0
Pretty simple, how do I prove (x^2)>0 ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
cacosomoza said:
Pretty simple, how do I prove (x^2)>0 ?

Why not use induction and try to prove it?
 
x belongs to R, not N, so I cannot apply induction
 
Assuming you meant to indicate that x is not equal to zero, then either x < 0 or x > 0.
Try using this property: If x < y and z > 0, then xz < yz, examining each case separately.
 
cacosomoza said:
Pretty simple, how do I prove (x^2)>0 ?
Well how you wrote it, it isn’t true since 0^2 = 0. You probably meant x^2 ≥ 0.

Since this is in the calculus and beyond forum do you know how to find minima for a function?

EDIT:
Or you could use the properties: that a positive real times a positive real is greater than 0, a negative real times a negative real is greater than 0.
 
Part of the requirements for any "ordered field" (which includes the field of real numbers but not the field of complex numbers) is that "if a< b and c> 0, then ac< bc". Take a= 0, b= x, c= x.
 
HallsofIvy said:
Part of the requirements for any "ordered field" (which includes the field of real numbers but not the field of complex numbers) is that "if a< b and c> 0, then ac< bc". Take a= 0, b= x, c= x.
slick
 

Similar threads

Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 12 ·
Replies
12
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
3K
  • · Replies 105 ·
4
Replies
105
Views
7K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K