Psi Meson Decay Modes: Spin, Parity, Quark Content & More

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around the decay modes of the Psi meson, focusing on aspects such as spin, parity, quark content, and related decay processes. Participants are exploring various facets of particle physics, particularly in the context of meson decay and interactions.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants attempt to explain the spin and parity of mesons and their quark content, while also discussing Feynman diagrams related to J/psi decay. Questions are raised regarding the decay processes of the chi meson and the minimum center of mass energy required for certain decays.

Discussion Status

There is ongoing exploration of the minimum center of mass energy for chi decays, with some participants questioning the values and assumptions presented. Multiple interpretations of the decay processes are being discussed, particularly regarding the interactions involved and the conditions for decay.

Contextual Notes

Participants are navigating through complex interactions and decay modes, with some posts indicating a need for clarification on the important elements in detectors and reactors, which may relate to the broader context of the discussion.

unscientific
Messages
1,728
Reaction score
13

Homework Statement



(a) Explain spin and parity of mesons
(b) State their quark content
(c) Draw a feynman diagram of J/psi decay
(d) Why doesn't ##\chi## undergo leptonic decay?
(e) What is the minimum centre of mass? [/B]

2013_B4_Q1.png

Homework Equations

The Attempt at a Solution



Part(a)[/B]
Spin is either 0 (singlet) or 1 (tripplet) for a pair of fermions. Parity is given by ##(-1)^{L+1}##.

Part(b)
Quark content is charm and anti-charm hadron ##c\bar c##. For ##1^-## states, ##L=0, S=1, J=1##. For ##0^+## states, ##L=1, S=1, J=0## through spin-orbit coupling. For ##1^+## states, ##L=1, S=0, J=1##. For ##2^+## states, ##L=S=1, J=2##.

Part(c)
EM decay of J\Psi to either ##e^+e^-## or ##\mu^+ \mu^-##:
2013_B4_Q1_2.png


Part (d)
Previously, it was kinematically impossible for strong interactions. Now that the mass of excited ##\psi^{''}## is higher, there is a direct possibility of decay in strong interaction to ##D^+D^-##. Strong interactions are preferred over weak interactions.

Part (e)
Why doesn't ##\chi## decay to pairs of charged leptons?
Possible reaction for ##\psi^{'} \rightarrow \chi_0 + \mu^{+} + \mu^{-}## or ##\psi^{'} \rightarrow \chi_0 + e^{+} + e^{-}##
2013_B4_Q1_3.png

For decay to ##\chi_1## and ##\chi_2## only ##e^{-}e^{+}## pairs are allowed.

Part (f)
I suppose minimum mass is ##m_{\chi2} + 2m_e = 3557 MeV##.
What are the important elements?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
bumpp
 
Important elements?
 
What are the important elements in a detector?
 
bumpppppp
 
what things that are important make a reactor?
 
For part (f) : Isn't the minimum centre of mass energy for ##\chi## decays to be observed simply the mass of ##m_\chi = 3415 MeV/c^2##?
 
bumpp part (f)
 
bump on part (f) Centre of mass energy?
 
  • #10
bumpp on part (f)
 
  • #11
bump on (f): Centre of Mass Energy
 
  • #12
bumpp - Centre of mass energy?
 
  • #13
bumpp on part (f)
 
  • #14
bumpp - is my centre of mass energy right? Part (f)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
4K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
4K
  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
6K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
3K