Puck collision with rod using angular momentum conservation

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around a problem involving a puck and putty collision, specifically focusing on the conservation of angular momentum and kinetic energy. Participants are exploring the implications of the putty's release point and its effect on the system's dynamics.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants are questioning the conditions under which angular momentum is conserved, particularly regarding the initial and final states of the system. There are discussions about the velocity components of the putty and how they relate to the plane of rotation.

Discussion Status

There is an ongoing exploration of the assumptions related to the forces and torques acting on the system. Some participants are providing clarifications about the nature of the forces involved and the definitions of the system being analyzed. Multiple interpretations of the problem are being discussed without a clear consensus.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the problem does not specify the exact point of the putty's release, leading to varying interpretations of its impact on the system's angular momentum. The discussion also highlights the distinction between internal and external forces in the context of the system being analyzed.

  • #31
Thank you for your replies @haruspex and @kuruman !

So since gravity is acting in the ##\hat k## direction means that the torque due to gravity on the putty is along the plane of rotation.

This means when the putty collides with the puck then the angular momentum of the puck in the ##\hat k## direction cannot be changed since the putty angular momentum dose not have component in the ##\hat k## direction since when it is falling is has angular momentum along the plane (in either the ##\hat x## or ##\hat y## direction or both) given by the right hand rule.

I see now that the solution should have specified that angular momentum is conserved in the ##\hat k## direction about the AoR. Now I see that they should have applied conservation of angular momentum in the ##\hat k## direction which is why the putty's angular velocity is zero.

Many thanks!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #32
Callumnc1 said:
the solution should have specified that angular momentum is conserved in the ##\hat k## direction about the AoR.
Why? "about the axis of rotation (of the puck)" implies the ##\hat k## direction.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: member 731016
  • #33
haruspex said:
Why? "about the axis of rotation (of the puck)" implies the ##\hat k## direction.
Thank you for your reply @haruspex ! True it dose imply ##\hat k## direction.
 

Similar threads

Replies
17
Views
2K
  • · Replies 71 ·
3
Replies
71
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
2K
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • · Replies 22 ·
Replies
22
Views
4K
Replies
335
Views
16K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
3K