Pumping water upwards in a column

  • Thread starter Thread starter cc94
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Column Water
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves calculating the energy required to pump water from a tank that is partially filled. The tank has a height of 10 m and currently contains 1000 kg of water at a height of 5 m. The question focuses on the energy needed to pump an additional 1000 kg of water to fill the tank to its full height, while ignoring friction and other losses.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning, Assumption checking

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the initial calculation of energy using the formula E = m*g*h, questioning whether it accurately reflects the situation as the tank fills. Some suggest that the work required increases as the height of the water column rises, leading to the consideration of an integral approach to account for varying pressure. Others explore the implications of atmospheric pressure and the shape of the tank on the calculations.

Discussion Status

The discussion is active, with participants exploring different interpretations of the problem. Some have suggested using integrals to account for the changing pressure as water is added, while others have raised questions about the role of atmospheric pressure and the shape of the tank. There is no explicit consensus, but several productive lines of reasoning are being developed.

Contextual Notes

Participants are considering assumptions about atmospheric pressure and the configuration of the tank, as well as the implications of varying cross-sectional area on the calculations. There is an acknowledgment of the complexity introduced by these factors.

cc94
Messages
19
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


Suppose you have a tank 10 m high. The tank is currently filled 5 m high with 1000 kg of water. How much energy does it take to pump in another 1000 kg of water from the bottom to fill the column to 10 m? (Ignore friction, etc.)

Homework Equations



E = m*g*h

The Attempt at a Solution


I'm always confused by what we're supposed to consider in fluid mechanics problems. Is the answer simply

1000*9.8*5

since the waterline is currently at 5 m and needs to be raised another 5 m? I would think that the more water is on top of the pump, the harder it would get to pump even more water inside.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
So 9.8*5*1000 would be if you are pumping 1000kg up by a height of 5m. But that isn't exactly what happens is it?
 
As the tank fills, it takes increasing amounts of work to add height ##dy## to what is already there because there is increasing pressure to work against. Your answer would be correct if it took the same amount of work to do that, i.e. if the force pushing down on the water you are adding did not increase as the height increases. You need to set up an integral.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
scottdave said:
So 9.8*5*1000 would be if you are pumping 1000kg up by a height of 5m. But that isn't exactly what happens is it?

Yeah I feel like I'm pumping a little water to a height of 5 m, then a little to 5.1 m, etc. My other idea was that I need to perform an integral over the height:

$$E = \int_5^{10} \rho gr\,dr$$

where ##\rho## is the weight of water per ##dr##.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
I think you have the right idea almost. The work is defined as the integral of F dot dx which in this case is the integral of p dV = p A dy. p at the bottom, if the tank is open to the atmosphere at the top is p(atm) + rho g h. The cross-sectional area of the tank you can get from the initial condition that the tank contains 1000 kg of water, 5 m deep which means the tank is 0.20 m^2 cross-sectional area. So the work is the integral from 5 m to 10 m of the quantity (p atm + rho g y) A dy
 
Dr Dr news said:
I think you have the right idea almost. The work is defined as the integral of F dot dx which in this case is the integral of p dV = p A dy. p at the bottom, if the tank is open to the atmosphere at the top is p(atm) + rho g h. The cross-sectional area of the tank you can get from the initial condition that the tank contains 1000 kg of water, 5 m deep which means the tank is 0.20 m^2 cross-sectional area. So the work is the integral from 5 m to 10 m of the quantity (p atm + rho g y) A dy

Ah, so I'm also forgetting to add on atmospheric pressure. Thanks! So one final question, now if I have a shape where the area changes as a function of height, I can just substitute in A(y) and the rest stays the same, correct? I seem to recall that pressure at depth doesn't depend on the shape of water above it, only the height.
 
Last edited:
cc94 said:
Ah, so I'm also forgetting to add on atmospheric pressure.
No no! @Dr Dr news seems to think the water at the bottom is not exposed to the atmosphere. I would assume it is, so atmospheric pressure cancels out.
Think about mass centres. What is the height of the mass centre of the pumped water before it is pumped? What about after?
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: scottdave
cc94: You are right. p does not rely on the shape but A(y) gives you V(y)
 
@haruspex I might have either situation. Thanks!

@Dr Dr news Cool, that's just what I needed. Thanks!
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
16
Views
6K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • · Replies 24 ·
Replies
24
Views
3K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • · Replies 6 ·
Replies
6
Views
3K