Pythagorean Triples: Is it Always True at Least One is Even?

  • Thread starter Thread starter EV33
  • Start date Start date
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion centers on the proof that in a Pythagorean triple (a, b, c), at least one of the integers a or b must be even. The proof by contradiction begins by assuming both a and b are odd, leading to the conclusion that c must be irrational, which contradicts the requirement for c to be an integer. The participants suggest simplifying the proof by considering remainders modulo 4, which provides a clearer understanding of the parity of a and b.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Pythagorean triples and the equation a² + b² = c²
  • Knowledge of proof by contradiction techniques
  • Familiarity with properties of odd and even integers
  • Basic modular arithmetic, specifically modulo 4
NEXT STEPS
  • Study the properties of Pythagorean triples in depth
  • Learn about proof techniques, particularly proof by contradiction
  • Explore modular arithmetic and its applications in number theory
  • Investigate the implications of parity in integer equations
USEFUL FOR

Mathematics students, educators, and anyone interested in number theory, particularly those studying properties of integers and Pythagorean triples.

EV33
Messages
192
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Let a,b,c be integers such that a2+b2=c2.

Is it always true that at least one of {a,b} is even?

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I say yes, and I am going to try and prove it with a proof by contrdiction.

Suppose a,b,c be integers such that a2+b2=c2 and that a and b are odd. By definition of odd a=2m+1, and b=2n+1, for some m,n in Z. By substitution we get c2= (2m+1)2+(2n+1)2. By simple arithmatic we get c2=2(2m2+2n2+2m+2n+1).
c=[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex][tex]\sqrt{2m^2+2n^2+2m+2n+1}[/tex].
Because the second square root has an odd number in it means that we can not pull out a 1/[tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex] to cancel out the [tex]\sqrt{2}[/tex]. This means that we will have an irrational answer, rather than an integer for all m,n in Z. Thus we have reached a contradiction.//

I was wondering if my logic is correct on this.

Thank you for your time.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
look reasonable to me, I think it is enough to note
[tex]c^2=2(2m^2+2n^2+2m+2n+1) = c^2=2(2k+1)[/tex]

where k is the integer given by
[tex]k = m^2+n^2+m+n[/tex]
 
I think it would be clearer if you skip the square root arguments and just talk about remainders mod 4 which is what I think lanedance is getting at.
 

Similar threads

Replies
7
Views
4K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • · Replies 19 ·
Replies
19
Views
4K
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
6K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
4K
Replies
20
Views
3K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K