[Q]Momentum eigenstate normailization

  • Context: Graduate 
  • Thread starter Thread starter good_phy
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Eigenstate
Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the normalization of momentum eigenstates in quantum mechanics, specifically addressing the formula presented in a textbook and its relation to the Fourier transform and Dirac delta function. Participants explore the definitions and conventions used in these contexts.

Discussion Character

  • Technical explanation
  • Conceptual clarification
  • Debate/contested

Main Points Raised

  • One participant questions the normalization of the momentum eigenstate represented by the formula \(\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{ikx}\) and its connection to the Dirac delta function.
  • Another participant suggests that the normalization factor arises from the definition of the Fourier transform, noting that different conventions exist but ultimately lead to equivalent results.
  • A participant expresses gratitude for understanding the connection between the Fourier transform and the inner product in mathematical spaces, likening it to a vector inner product.
  • Further inquiries are made regarding the concept of Hilbert space and the definition of a general vector product in this context.
  • Clarification is sought on what is meant by "general vector product," with a specific reference to the inner product of momentum eigenfunctions.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants do not reach a consensus on the normalization issue, and there are multiple competing views regarding the definitions and conventions of the Fourier transform and inner products in quantum mechanics.

Contextual Notes

The discussion highlights the dependence on definitions and conventions in quantum mechanics, particularly concerning normalization and inner products, without resolving the underlying mathematical details.

good_phy
Messages
45
Reaction score
0
Hi

I use liboff quantum mechanics textbook fourth edition.

5.25 fomula of 122 page is [itex]\frac{1}{\sqrt{2\pi}}e^{ikx}[/itex]

I thought it is nomalized, but i don't know exactly why [itex]\sqrt{2\pi}[/itex] is denominator.

I think it seemed to be linked Dirac-delta function [itex]\int_{\infty}^{\infty}\frac{1}{2\pi}e^{i(k-k^{'})x} = \delta(k-k^')[/atex] but i have no idea what is going on exactly.<br /> <br /> Please Help me<br /> <br /> Thank for reading this question.[/itex]
 
Physics news on Phys.org
I think it is because of his definition of Fourier transform. Different people use different conventions. In the end, they are all equivalent of course and should give the same results.

See, for example this link ("Other conventions" section).
 
Thank you so much that i found Fourier transform is included general innerproduct

in some mathematical space as l Fourier transform is just analogous to vector

innerproduct between momentum eigenfunction and statefunction. thank you.

but i have one questiong. what is hilbert space in which general vectorproduct is

defined?
 
good_phy said:
but i have one questiong. what is hilbert space in which general vectorproduct is defined?

What do you mean by general vector product?
 
It means innerproduct such as [tex]<\varphi_{k}|\varphi{_{k^'}}>[/tex] i described

product of this form as more general form of 'vector innerproduct in normal vector space'
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
3K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 21 ·
Replies
21
Views
3K