How can one obtain conserved charges from a symmetry transformation in QFT?

  • Thread starter Thread starter center o bass
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Charge Qft
Click For Summary
SUMMARY

The discussion focuses on deriving conserved charges from a symmetry transformation in Quantum Field Theory (QFT) using Noether's theorem. The Lagrangian density provided is L = (1/2) ∂μφa ∂μφa - (1/2) φa φa, with a transformation φa → φa + θ εabc nb φc. The conserved charges are expressed as Q_a = ∫ d^3x εabc dot(φ_b) φ_c. Participants clarify the correct form of the conserved current jμ and explore the implications of choosing different vectors for nb to obtain independent conserved charges.

PREREQUISITES
  • Understanding of Noether's theorem in Quantum Field Theory
  • Familiarity with Lagrangian mechanics and field transformations
  • Knowledge of tensor notation and indices in physics
  • Basic concepts of conserved currents and charges in field theory
NEXT STEPS
  • Study Noether's theorem applications in various physical systems
  • Learn about the derivation of conserved currents from symmetries in QFT
  • Explore the implications of symmetry transformations on physical observables
  • Investigate the role of vector fields in defining conserved charges
USEFUL FOR

Physicists, graduate students in theoretical physics, and researchers interested in Quantum Field Theory and the mathematical foundations of conservation laws.

center o bass
Messages
545
Reaction score
2

Homework Statement


From the Lagrangian density

L = \frac{1}2 \partial_\mu \phi_a \partial^\mu \phi_a - \frac{1}2 \phi_a \phi_a,

where a = 1,2,3 and the transformation

\phi_a \to \phi _a + \theta \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c

show that one gets the conserved charges

Q_a = \int d^3x \epsilon_{abc}\dot{\phi}_b \phi_c.

Homework Equations


The transformation is a symmetry of the Lagrangian so by Noethers theorem
we got a conserved current which is given by

j^\mu = \frac{\partial L}{\partial(\partial_\mu \phi_a)} \delta \phi_a = \partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c

The Attempt at a Solution


The obvious conserved charge is just

Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c
but this is not the 3 different charges in the expression for Q_a. There is no normal vector n in that expresion and the time differentiated field has got b-index instead of an a index.
How can one get from the conserved current to the expression for these charges?
[
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Your expression for the conserved current doesn't look correct. In the middle term, you sum over a, but in the expression on the right, a is a free index.
 
vela said:
Your expression for the conserved current doesn't look correct. In the middle term, you sum over a, but in the expression on the right, a is a free index.

I agree and I have corrected it now. That was just a typo. Do you have any suggestion on how to go from the corrected expression to the conserved charge?
 
center o bass said:
Q_a = \int d^3x \epsilon_{abc}\dot{\phi}_a \phi_c.

Is there a typo here for the subscript on the left side?
The obvious conserved charge is just

Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c
but this is not the 3 different charges in the expression for Q_a.

Is the Lagrangian invariant under the transformation for any choice of the vector nb? If so, you should be able to get three independent conserved charges by choosing three independent vectors for n. For example, what would the conserved charge be if you choose n1 = 1 and n2 = n3 = 0?
 
TSny said:
Is there a typo here for the subscript on the left side?Is the Lagrangian invariant under the transformation for any choice of the vector nb? If so, you should be able to get three independent conserved charges by choosing three independent vectors for n. For example, what would the conserved charge be if you choose n1 = 1 and n2 = n3 = 0?

Yes there was yet another typo. I have corrected that one too now. That's true.
Hmm.. The conserved current satisfy

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c) = 0

I agree with you that one should be able to get 3 independent conserved charges (and also currents), so what if i chose all components to be zero except the a'th component?
I.e. choose

n_b = \delta _{ba}.

Would it then be correct of me to write

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} \delta_{ab} \phi_c) =\partial_\mu ( \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c)= 0

so that i get

(j^\mu)_a = \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c?
 
center o bass said:
Yes there was yet another typo. I have corrected that one too now. That's true.
Hmm.. The conserved current satisfy

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} n_b \phi_c) = 0

I agree with you that one should be able to get 3 independent conserved charges (and also currents), so what if i chose all components to be zero except the a'th component?
I.e. choose

n_b = \delta _{ba}.

You don't want to use a subscript "a" here, since you are already using that symbol as a dummy summation index in jμ.

Would it then be correct of me to write

\partial_\mu (\partial^\mu \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} \delta_{ab} \phi_c) =\partial_\mu ( \epsilon_{abc} \partial^\mu \phi_b \phi_c)= 0

See, the subscript "a" is occurring three times here on the left. That's not good.

You might try again by letting n_b = \delta _{bd}. so that you're letting nd be the nonzero component of n.

You can actually go to your result for Q in your original post: Q = \int d^3x j^0 = \int d^3 x \dot \phi_a \epsilon_{abc} nb \phi_c and make this substitution rather than starting way back at the expression for jμ.
 
Last edited:

Similar threads

  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 57 ·
2
Replies
57
Views
18K
  • · Replies 30 ·
2
Replies
30
Views
7K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 17 ·
Replies
17
Views
3K
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • · Replies 15 ·
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K