QFT for the Gifted Amateur Exercise 17.1

Join the discussion
Ask a follow-up here, or get your own question answered by working scientists, mathematicians and engineers — people, not an autocomplete.
Real named experts · corrections over time · the nuance an AI answer skips
2 replies · 2K views
43arcsec
Messages
37
Reaction score
4
43arcsec said:
In exercise 17.1 we are asked to show that the propagator:

$$G^+_o(p,t_x,q,t_y)=\theta(t_x-t_y)<0|\hat{a}_p(t_x)\hat{a}^\dagger_q(t_y)|0>$$ is the same as

$$\theta(t_x-t_y)e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}\delta^{(3)}(p-q)$$

so we can take the time dependence out of the creation and annihilation operators by using the time evolution operators giving us

$$\theta(t_x-t_y)<0|e^{iHt_x}\hat{a}_pe^{-iH(t_x-t_y)}\hat{a}^\dagger_q e^{-iHt_y}|0>$$

If I have this right, then the rightmost Hamiltonian acts on the ground state |0> to produce $$e^{-iE_gt_y}$$
The middle Hamiltonian acts on the ground state with a particle of momentum q added at times tx and ty to produce $$e^{-i(E_g+E_q)t_x-i(E_g+E_q)t_y}$$
The leftmost Hamiltonian acts on the ground state, the particle of momentum q and an annihilated particle p (which turns the energy negative?) at time tx producing $$e^{-i(E_g+E_q-E_q)t_x}$$
Putting this all together we arrive at the correct energy term $$e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}$$

Rewriting, $$G^+_o(p,t_x,q,t_y)=\theta(t_x-t_y)e^{-i(E_pt_x-E_qt_y)}<0|\hat{a}_p\hat{a}^\dagger_q|0>$$
So I am left with the questions:

1)what justifies the creation and annihilation operators combining to give the $$\delta^{(3)}(p-q)$$
2) where does the 3 come from on the $$\delta^{(3)}$$
 
2) The (3) is just a shorthand for the 3-dimensional Dirac delta, ## δ(p_x - q_x) δ(p_y - q_y) δ(p_z - q_z) ##.

1) My knowledge here is rather shaky, but since no one has answered you, I'll give it a shot. Think of a superposition of 2 sine functions with frequencies p and q. For p≠q, they interfere constructively and destructively, so that the integral over all the reals vanishes. For p=q, they interfere constructively everywhere, giving a nonzero contribution. The time dependent ladder operators here do the same: their product vanishes for p≠q, leaving only the contribution for p=q, which is just what δ means.

So I suppose you'd have to replace the operators by the δ before you take out the time dependence, but at that point I'm lost as well.

Hope that helps.
 
You still need to do the last step, right? You need to calculate [tex]\langle 0 | a_p a^\dagger_q |0 \rangle[/tex] To calculate this, you need to express it in terms of a commutator and a product [itex]\langle 0 | a^\dagger_q a_p |0 \rangle[/itex] which gives zero. The commutator piece will give you the three-dimensional delta function.