QM operator and double slit experiment doubt basics

Click For Summary

Discussion Overview

The discussion revolves around the basics of quantum mechanics (QM), specifically focusing on the role and interpretation of operators, such as the position and momentum operators, in relation to the wave function (psi) and their application in the double slit experiment as presented in a lecture by Susskind.

Discussion Character

  • Exploratory, Technical explanation, Conceptual clarification

Main Points Raised

  • One participant expresses confusion about the meaning of operating the wave function (psi) with position and momentum operators, questioning what results are obtained and their significance.
  • Another participant clarifies that psi is a symbol for the wave function and that the position operator is typically denoted as X, suggesting that "psi times x" does not make sense in this context.
  • A participant explains that applying the position operator X to a wave function results in the function being multiplied by its variable, seeking to understand the practical use of the position operator.
  • There is a discussion about the eigenvalues of the position operator, with one participant suggesting they represent the probability of finding a particle at a specific position, while another notes the lack of "physical" eigenfunctions for X, which would imply particles at exact locations.

Areas of Agreement / Disagreement

Participants exhibit some agreement on the definitions and roles of the operators, but there remains uncertainty regarding the interpretation of the results from operating the wave function and the implications of the eigenvalues of the position operator. The discussion does not reach a consensus on these points.

Contextual Notes

There are limitations in the clarity of definitions and the understanding of the operators' applications, as well as unresolved questions about the interpretation of results from quantum mechanical operations.

santo35
Messages
28
Reaction score
0
well i am a starter in QM, i have 2 big doubts ! let me first tell what i understood ,
there is phsi which defines a state of a system, phsi times x is a position operator and phsi 's derivative of x multiplied by i h is its momentum operator ...
well then i operator these in phsi and what do i get in return, i mean what is the actual meaning of the result of operating phsi with position and momentum operator ?

This is in regard with the modern physics QM lecture by Susskind lecture 4, when he derives the double slit experiment, he uses phsi as exponential function for the electron after it passes through the slit , how well is he justified in assuming that ?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
Do you mean psi (##\psi##)? That is just a symbol, frequently used for a wave function.
A usual symbol for the position operator is X. "psi times x" does not make sense in that context.
well then i operator these in phsi and what do i get in return, i mean what is the actual meaning of the result of operating phsi with position and momentum operator ?
I don't understand that question.
how well is he justified in assuming that ?
I don't think you describe the textbook content accurately here, but the experimental results agree very well with the predictions based on the calculations done there.
 
yea i ment psi, and the position operator X... well what the position operator does to a vector funstion is that take the function and multiplies by its variable rite? like X|f(x)> -> x*f(x) ... that's how he explains position operator in previous lectures.
well my question is , i operate X on psi , and what do i get in return? well or basically what is the use of position operator ?
its eigen values gives us the probability of finding the position of the particle at 'x' ?
PS thanks for your reply !
 
and what do i get in return?
In position space, the wave function multiplied with the position.
what is the use of position operator ?
You can use it to calculate the expected ("average") position, for example.
##\langle X \rangle = \langle \psi | X | \psi \rangle##
its eigen values gives us the probability of finding the position of the particle at 'x' ?
There are no "physical" eigenfunctions for X. They would correspond to particles at a single, exact location.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
700
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 36 ·
2
Replies
36
Views
8K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
4K
  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
3K
  • · Replies 33 ·
2
Replies
33
Views
4K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K