QM: Prove Dirac Eigenstates of SHO are Orthonormal

  • Thread starter Thread starter hanks721
  • Start date Start date
  • Tags Tags
    Qm
Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The problem involves demonstrating the orthonormality of the eigenstates of the simple harmonic oscillator (SHO) using Dirac notation. The context is quantum mechanics, specifically focusing on the properties of eigenstates in relation to the SHO.

Discussion Character

  • Conceptual clarification, Mathematical reasoning

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the requirement to show that the inner product of different eigenstates is zero, specifically =0. There is an attempt to express this in terms of the creation operator applied to the ground state. Some participants question the precision of the phrasing "show that" and suggest considering the canonical commutator relation.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing feedback on attempts to articulate the problem. Some guidance has been offered regarding the dual correspondence in Dirac notation, and there is an acknowledgment of the need for clarity in the mathematical expressions involved.

Contextual Notes

Participants note challenges in expressing mathematical equations and the potential ambiguity in the problem statement. There is a recognition of the need for a more precise formulation of the task at hand.

hanks721
Messages
6
Reaction score
0

Homework Statement



Show that the eigenstates of the simple harmonic oscillator using Dirac notations are orthonormal.

Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution

 
Physics news on Phys.org
attempt? ...
 
Sorry malawi_glenn. I didn't post the attempt because I don't know how to write equations like everybody else does!
But I'll try to explain.
The first thing that came up to my mind is, to prove orthonormality I have to show,
<psi_m|psi_n>=0
and that is,

<psi_0|[(a^dagger)^m]/sqrt(m!)*[(a^dagger)^n]/sqrt(n!)|psi_0>=0

and then, I don't know how to evaluate further.

Once again, I'm sorry. I hope you don't get annoyed by my poor explanation.
Thanks
 
we can read it, do your best effort

now the dual correspondance to (a^dagger |psi>) is (<psi| a)

So, start over again.
 
also "show that"... is quite unprecise, since you construct states |n> according to (a^dagger)^n]/sqrt(n!)|psi_0> in order to make orthonormality.

What may be used? The canonical commutator relation only? Or what? Boring excerice I would say ;-)
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 8 ·
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 13 ·
Replies
13
Views
3K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • · Replies 14 ·
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • · Replies 1 ·
Replies
1
Views
2K