Orthonormality of Spherical Harmonics Y_1,1 and Y_2,1

In summary: You should first take out your calculus textbook and revise multi-variable integration as well as ODEs.
  • #1
MxwllsPersuasns
101
0

Homework Statement


Here is a copy of the pdf problem set {https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwiADXXgAYUHOTNrZm16NHlibUU} the problem in question is problem number 1 which asks you to prove the orthonormality of the spherical Harmonics Y_1,1 and Y_2,1.

Homework Equations


Y_1,1 = -sqrt(3/8pi)e^(i(/))sin(-)
Y_2,1 = -sqrt(15/8pi)e^(i(/))sin(-)cos(-)
<l,m|l',m'> = Integral from 0 to pi of {sin(-)d(-)}*Integral from 0 to 2pi of {Y*_l,m(Y_l',m')d(/)} = delta_ll'(delta_mm')
(-) = THETA
(/) = PHI
delta = dirac delta function

The Attempt at a Solution


Looking at the 3 equations above something is a little ambiguous. It shows two integrals in the calculation of <l,m|l',m'>, one with d(-) and one with d(/). Now I see that both spehrical harmonics in question have (-) terms, i.e., sin(-), so is that d(-) integral just there from pulling the sin(-) out of Y_1,1 and Y_2,1? That's what I would imagine but it's doesn't explicate a dependence only on (/) in the spherical harmonics (unless the notion of being paired with d(/) only (and not d(-)) is rationale enough to interpret as only being functions of (/))

Actually as I'm looking at the forumlas Y_2,1 couldn't be a function of (/) only after we pulled out the sines as it also has a cos(-) term.. I'm very confused can someone help me move forward here?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Just write down and perform the integrals after inserting the expressions for the spherical harmocs. You will have an integrand that is on product form, which is easy to solve.
 
  • #3
MxwllsPersuasns said:
(-) = THETA
(/) = PHI
At the top of the field where you type the text to be posted, you will notice a ##\sum##. Click on it to have access to common symbols. Also, x2 and x2 allows to write sub- and superscripts.
 
  • #4
I see well what I'm getting tripped up on is the fact that in the forumla for Y_2,1 there's a sin(-) (which gets extracted out into the d(-) integral) and ALSO a cos(-) but it doesn't seem that the cosine gets extracted out of Y_2,1 and hence still exists within the d(/) integral. I'm not sure why I'm having so much trouble with this but I know that the e^-i(/) and e^i(/) will cancel and that will leave me with my two sqrt coefficients and also the cos(-). Do I just move the cos(-) then into the d(-) integral and make it sin(-)cos(-)d(-) from 0 to pi? Or would it become something like (/)cos(-) as cos(-) has no (/) dependence it would be treated as a constant within the interval
 
  • #5
Oh hey thanks DrClaude I completely missed that! Appreciate the help :)
 
  • #6
$$
\int \int f(\theta) g(\phi) d\theta d\phi = \int \left[ \int f(\theta) d\theta \right] g(\phi) d\phi = \left[ \int f(\theta) d\theta \right] \left[ \int g(\phi) d\phi \right]
$$
and so on.
 
  • #7
MxwllsPersuasns said:
ALSO a cos(-) but it doesn't seem that the cosine gets extracted out of Y_2,1 and hence still exists within the d(/) integral.
What do you mean by this? Of course the cosθ is part of the θ integral. Nothing can depend on θ once you have performed that integral.
MxwllsPersuasns said:
Do I just move the cos(-) then into the d(-) integral and make it sin(-)cos(-)d(-) from 0 to pi?
dont forget the sine from the other harmonic or that coning from the area element!
 
  • #8
Okay I think I'm getting tripped up because it shows the formula worked out where only the sin θ is in the dθ integral. That led me to believe that the cos θ in the Y2,1 harmonic stayed in that harmonic and thus within the d∅ integral. What you guys are telling me to do is indeed to move that cosθ into the dθ integral so then rather than the formula above I'd have something like:

∫sinθcosθdθ∫√(...)e-i∅√(...)ei∅d∅??​
 
  • #9
MxwllsPersuasns said:
∫sinθcosθdθ∫√(...)e-i∅√(...)ei∅d∅??​
As @Orodruin mentioned, you are missing some terms in ##\theta## in there. Are why are you not taking out the square roots out of the integration?

Considering the problems you are having here and in the other thread on the radial problem, I think you should first take out your calculus textbook and revise multi-variable integration as well as ODEs.
 
  • #10
MxwllsPersuasns said:
Okay I think I'm getting tripped up because it shows the formula worked out where only the sin θ is in the dθ integral.
What is "it"? Please write out everything you refer to in the thread.
 
  • #11
Oh I'm sorry Orodruin I was being lazy with my typing. The "it" I'm referring to is the third equation I listed in my first post

<l,m|l',m'> = ∫ sinΘdΘ ∫ Y*l,mYl',m'd∅

I was referring to the fact that the first integral shown here is displayed as having a sinΘ term (presumably from both the Spherical Harmonic functions) but it didn't show the cosΘ (which is involved in Y2,1) so I assumed it was still within the Y2,1 which is in the second integral (the d∅ one). So my question was given that, do I just pull the cosΘ out of the second integral and put it into the first where it would be properly integrated? Is that something I can do?
 
  • #12
MxwllsPersuasns said:
presumably from both the Spherical Harmonic functions
No, it is from the surface element of the sphere expressed in spherical coordinates. There is nothing that has been "extracted" here.
MxwllsPersuasns said:
So my question was given that, do I just pull the cosΘ out of the second integral and put it into the first where it would be properly integrated? Is that something I can do?
The integrand is inside both integrals. There is no "changing" of which integral the terms belong to.
 
  • #13
Ah okay so then I carry out the integrals with the full formulae for the spherical harmonic functions and the sinΘ is "extra" in that its not from the spherical harmonic functions. I got tripped up by the way the formula was presented I suppose. I assumed all of the functions with explicit dependence on theta would be shown within the theta integral and simultaneously that the first integral "closed off" or stopped being valid for all things to the right of the dΘ term but I see the thetas are implicit in the Y-functions and are to be integrated along with all other terms dependent on theta.
 
  • #14
I ended up finishing the problem pretty easily after your clarification Orodruin, just wanted to say thanks again for the help. I really appreciate it. Have a nice evening!
 

1. What is the definition of orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1?

Orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 refers to the property that these two functions are both orthogonal and normalized. This means that their inner product is equal to zero and their magnitude is equal to 1.

2. How is orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 useful in scientific research?

Orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 is useful in many fields of science, such as physics, chemistry, and astronomy. It allows for the decomposition of complex functions into simpler components, making it easier to study and understand physical phenomena.

3. Can you explain the mathematical concept of orthonormality in relation to spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1?

Mathematically, orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 means that the integral of their product over the unit sphere is equal to 1 if the two functions are the same and equal to 0 if they are different. This is a consequence of the functions being orthogonal and normalized.

4. Are there any other important properties of orthonormal spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1?

Yes, orthonormality is just one of the many important properties of spherical harmonics. Other properties include completeness, which means that any function on the unit sphere can be expanded as a linear combination of spherical harmonics, and symmetry, which relates to the behavior of the functions under rotations.

5. How can one determine the orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 experimentally?

The orthonormality of spherical harmonics Y1,1 and Y2,1 can be determined experimentally by measuring their inner product and magnitude. This can be done using various instruments and techniques, depending on the specific application and field of study.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
733
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
2K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Linear and Abstract Algebra
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
Back
Top