Quadratic inequalities with absolute values

Click For Summary

Homework Help Overview

The discussion revolves around solving the inequality ##\frac{3}{|x+3|-1}\geq |x+2|##, which involves absolute values and quadratic inequalities. Participants explore the implications of different cases based on the definitions of absolute values and the conditions under which the inequalities hold.

Discussion Character

  • Mixed

Approaches and Questions Raised

  • Participants discuss the validity of solutions derived from different cases of the absolute values, questioning whether to express the solutions as separate intervals or as a union. There is also a focus on ensuring that all constraints from the inequalities are considered, particularly regarding the conditions under which the left side of the inequality is nonnegative.

Discussion Status

The discussion is ongoing, with participants providing guidance on notation and the implications of using unions versus separate intervals. Some participants express uncertainty about the validity of certain cases and the need to eliminate invalid solutions from consideration.

Contextual Notes

Participants note that the absolute value expressions lead to specific constraints, such as ##|x + 3| \ge 0## and ##|x + 3| \le 0##, which can only hold true under certain conditions. There is also mention of the importance of correctly interpreting the implications of the inequalities and the notation used to express the solution sets.

Callmelucky
Messages
144
Reaction score
30
Homework Statement
What is the right way to write solutions?
Relevant Equations
##=\frac{-b\pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}##
I was given a problem to solve that goes like this ##\frac{3}{|x+3|-1}\geq |x+2|## . I got the correct solution for all possible cases and here they are; for ##|x+3|\geq0## and ##|x+2|\geq## i got ##x\epsilon <-2, -2\sqrt{3} ]## and for ##|x+3|\leq0## , ##|x+2|\leq0## I got ##x\epsilon [-5, -4> ##
For other cases there is no possible solutions.
Now, my question is, since these are answers for different scenarios ##|x+3|\geq0## and ##|x+2|\geq0## and ##|x+3|\leq0## and ##|x+2|\leq0##, should I leave solutions as answers separately or should I write them as union eg. ##x\epsilon [-5, -4> U <-2, -2+\sqrt{3}]##?
Thank you.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
Callmelucky said:
Homework Statement:: What is the right way to write solutions?
Relevant Equations:: ##=\frac{-b\pm \sqrt{b^2-4ac}}{2a}##

I was given a problem to solve that goes like this ##\frac{3}{|x+3|-1}\geq |x+2|## . I got the correct solution for all possible cases and here they are; for ##|x+3|\geq0## and ##|x+2|\geq## i got ##x\epsilon <-2, -2\sqrt{3} ]## and for ##|x+3|\leq0## , ##|x+2|\leq0## I got ##x\epsilon [-5, -4> ##
For other cases there is no possible solutions.
Now, my question is, since these are answers for different scenarios ##|x+3|\geq0## and ##|x+2|\geq0## and ##|x+3|\leq0## and ##|x+2|\leq0##, should I leave solutions as answers separately or should I write them as union eg. ##x\epsilon [-5, -4> U <-2, -2+\sqrt{3}]##?
Thank you.
You have some overlap in your inequalities. ##|x + 3| \ge 0## but ##|x + 3| \le 0## has only 1 solution (x = -3), and no solutions for ##|x + 3| \lt 0##. Same is true for |x + 2|.
Assuming your work is correct, you can write the intervals as a union or with the word "or" between them.

Either of the below would be fine.
##x \in [-5, -4) \cup (-2, -2 + \sqrt 3]##
##-5 \le x \lt -4 \text{ or } -2 \le x \lt -2 + \sqrt 3##

Note that to indicate the inclusion of an endpoint, one common notation is a bracket, but to exclude an endpoint, a parenthesis is often used.

BTW, you probably should use \in rather than \epsilon. They look similar, but the first is easier to type.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Callmelucky
Callmelucky said:
I got the correct solution for all possible cases and here they are; for ##|x+3|\geq0## and ##|x+2|\geq##
##|x + 3| \ge 0## by the definition of the absolute value, but |x + 3| can't be equal to 1. This means that ##x \ne -2## and ##x \ne -4##. Your solution shows this, but I don't see that you have considered this otherwise.
 
  • Like
Likes   Reactions: Callmelucky
Mark44 said:
You have some overlap in your inequalities. ##|x + 3| \ge 0## but ##|x + 3| \le 0## has only 1 solution (x = -3), and no solutions for ##|x + 3| \lt 0##. Same is true for |x + 2|.
Assuming your work is correct, you can write the intervals as a union or with the word "or" between them.

Either of the below would be fine.
##x \in [-5, -4) \cup (-2, -2 + \sqrt 3]##
##-5 \le x \lt -4 \text{ or } -2 \le x \lt -2 + \sqrt 3##

Note that to indicate the inclusion of an endpoint, one common notation is a bracket, but to exclude an endpoint, a parenthesis is often used.

BTW, you probably should use \in rather than \epsilon. They look similar, but the first is easier to type.
Thank you, but if I write it with the union, wouldn't that mean that for both cases both solutions are valid? Which they are not.
Thanks for the tip.
 
Mark44 said:
##|x + 3| \ge 0## by the definition of the absolute value, but |x + 3| can't be equal to 1. This means that ##x \ne -2## and ##x \ne -4##. Your solution shows this, but I don't see that you have considered this otherwise.
I haven't. But I know I need to do that. Thanks for letting me know.
 
Callmelucky said:
Thank you, but if I write it with the union, wouldn't that mean that for both cases both solutions are valid? Which they are not.
Thanks for the tip.
I didn't work through the whole problem, so I don't know which cases are valid or invalid. If you have some cases that turn out to be invalid, then your work along the way should have eliminated those cases from consideration.

The left side of your inequality is ##\frac 3 {|x + 3| - 1}##. The connector is ##\ge##, which means the fraction must be nonnegative. For this to happen, |x + 3| - 1 must be nonnegative, and |x + 3| can't be equal to 1. Any cases you develop should take these constraints into account.
 
Callmelucky said:
Thank you, but if I write it with the union, wouldn't that mean that for both cases both solutions are valid? Which they are not.
Thanks for the tip.
Or and union in this context are equivalent.
 
You could even express the solution set as \begin{split}<br /> x &amp;\in \left((-\infty, -4) \cap (-5, - 1)\right) \cup \left((-2, \infty) \cap [-2 - \sqrt{3}, -2 + \sqrt{3}]\right) \\<br /> &amp;= [-5, - 4) \cup (-2, -2 + \sqrt{3}] \end{split}<br /> since in both cases the solution must (1) lie between the two roots of a quadratic, and (2) satisfy the conditions under which that quadratic was derived.
 

Similar threads

  • · Replies 9 ·
Replies
9
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
3K
  • · Replies 7 ·
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • · Replies 2 ·
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • · Replies 10 ·
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • · Replies 11 ·
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • · Replies 4 ·
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • · Replies 5 ·
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • · Replies 3 ·
Replies
3
Views
2K
  • · Replies 18 ·
Replies
18
Views
2K